Bibliographic record
Abstract
Procyon lotor (Linnaeus 1758) [Ursus] lotor Linnaeus 1758, Syst. Nat., 10th ed., Vol. 1: 48. Type Locality: "Americæ maritimis," restricted by Thomas (1911 a) to " Pennsylvania " [USA]. Vernacular Names: Raccoon. Subspecies:: Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. lotor Linnaeus 1758 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. auspicatus Nelson 1930 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. elucus Bangs 1898 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. excelsus Nelson and Goldman 1930 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. fuscipes Mearns 1914 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. gloveralleni Nelson and Goldman 1930 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. grinnelli Nelson and Goldman 1930 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. hernandezii Wagler 1831 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. hirtus Nelson and Goldman 1930 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. incautus Nelson 1930 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. inesperatus Nelson 1930 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. insularis Merriam 1898 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. litoreus Nelson and Goldman 1930 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. marinus Nelson 1930 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. maynardi Bangs 1898 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. megalodous Lowery 1943 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. pacificus Merriam 1899 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. pallidus Merriam 1900 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. psora Gray 1842 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. pumilus Miller 1911 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. simus Gidley 1906 Subspecies Procyon lotor subsp. vancouverensis Nelson and Goldman 1930 Distribution: S Canada, Mexico, Panama, USA (except parts of the Rocky Mtns). Introductions into: Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Russia, Switzerland, Uzbekistan. Conservation: IUCN – Extinct as P. gloveralleni, Endangered as P. insularis, P. maynardi, and P. minor, Lower Risk (lc) as P. lotor. Discussion: Reviewed by Lotze and Anderson (1979). Includes the Caribbean introduced populations of gloveralleni, minor, and maynardi after Helgen and Wilson (2003); includes insularis after Helgen and Wilson (In Press). Synonyms allocated according to Cabrera (1957), Lotze and Anderson (1979), and Helgen and Wilson (2003; In Press).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".