Andinocopris Génier & Darling 2024, gen. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Andinocopris gen. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: DB47A9F1-784F-4431-A7AA-2044987EF94D Type species Pinotus achamas Harold, 1867, present designation. Differential diagnosis Dorsal ocular width greater than one quarter of interocular distance. Lateral pronotal carina and pronotal edge joined anteriorly and posteriorly, forming closed ellipse. Pronotal armament in the form of an overhanging ridge or bifurcating projection in large individuals of both sexes. Elytral stria 8 usually absent, remnant present on apical elytral hump and connected to stria five in some individuals of A. achamas (Fig. 62). Meso-metasternal suture posteriorly arcuate (Fig. 60). ♂ FLP endophallite sigmoidal, abruptly narrowing and inflecting medially (Figs 31–32). Etymology Andinocopris is a combination of the New Latin adjective ‘ andinus ’ and the Ancient Greek noun ‘κόπρος’ (‘ kópros ’). The former refers to the Andes, where the genus occurs at high elevations from Colombia to Peru, and the latter refers to its association with dung. Description Body length 20–34 mm. Anteroventral clypeal tooth, rather small, transverse and varying from truncated to acute in frontal view. Dorsal ocular width greater than one-quarter interocular distance. Anterior pronotal edge straight (A. achamas) or slightly sinuous (A. buckleyi) medially. Anterior pronotal membrane very wide laterally, transition between membrane and anterior edge of pronotum ill-defined medially. Anteromedial pronotal surface smooth. Lateral pronotal carina and pronotal edge joined anteriorly and posteriorly, forming closed carinated ellipse. Pronotal armament in large individuals of both sexes forming overhanging ridge or bifurcating projection; ventral surface of overhanging armament uneven. Anterior apex of prosternum broadly rounded. Underside of elytron with long semi-erected setae. Elytral stria 8 usually absent, remanent present on apical elytral hump and connected to stria five in some individuals of A. achamas. Hindwing with AP reduced (Figs 39–40). Meso-metasternal suture posteriorly arcuate (Fig. 60). Surface of median metasternal lobe convex, some individuals with shallow and narrow longitudinal sulcus; surface setigerous anterolaterally, impunctate or finely punctate throughout. Pygidial surface finely punctate. ♂ paramere tapering slightly in lateral view; apex blunt. FLP endophallite sigmoidal, narrowing and inflecting centrally. Distribution Colombia, Ecuador, Peru.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".