MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948838404 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10390944

Licea pygmaea Ing, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.

2023· article· en· W6948838404 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSporeBark (sound)DehiscenceAscomycota

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

20. Licea pygmaea (Meyl.) Ing, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 78(3): 443 (1982) Figs. 17A–L ≡ Licea pusilla var. pygmaea Meyl., Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 58: 89 (1933) Sporophores sporocarpic, scattered to gregarious, sessile. Sporocarps subglobose to pulvinate, angular, 0.05–0.1 mm diam., brown. Peridium double, outer layer horny, inner layer membranous; dehiscence into platelets along shiny ridges, platelet margins with prominent outgrowths. Spores free, dark olive to dull dark brown in mass, greenish yellow by TL, globose, 12–13 µm diam., minutely evenly warted. By SEM the inner peridium inner surface is warted with different sized warts and some bare patches (Figs. 17 I – J); the platelet margins have different sized outgrowths mostly in a single row but sometimes overlapping, fused and sausage-shaped (Figs. 17 I – J); the epispore is covered with flattened bacula evenly dispersed, sometimes two or more fused (Figs. 17 K – L). Material examined: Lectotypus. SWITZERLAND. Vaud, nr. Ste Croix, La Gittaz, 1250 m, OCT 1930. Myxo 055 (LAU)!. (Designated by Kowlaski, Mycologia 67: 448-494. 1975). Habitat: on bark of living and dead trees, trunks, stumps and debris of angiosperms and gymnosperms. Distribution: Norway, Sweden, Lithuania, Russian Federation, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Poland, Ireland, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Switzerland, Austria, India, Vietnam, Japan, Congo Democratic Republic, USA, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Australia, New Zealand. Icon.: Nannenga-Bremekamp (1965: 140, Figs. 7 B – C, as L. pusilla var. pygmaea; 1975: 66, as L. pusilla var. pygmaea; 1991: 45, as L. pusilla var. pygmaea), Gilert (1996: 517, Figs. 1–2, 5–6; 518, Figs. 7–8, 11–12; 520, Figs. 11–12, 14, all the images as L. pusilla), Lado & Pando (1997: 130, Figs. 37a–b), Yamamoto (2002a: 3. Figs. 1 A – D; 2004: 23, Figs. 3 A – C; 2006: 35, Figs. 15 A – D; 2021: 148, Figs. A – D), Poulain et al. (2011: 70), Ronikier et al. (2017: 253, Figs. 4 G – K), López-Villalba & Moreno (2020: 149, Figs. 3a–d), Johannesen & Vetlesen (2020: 79, Figs 40 A), Bortnikov et al. (2022: 39, Figs. 15a–k). Notes. This species was published by Meylan (1933), as a variety of L. pusilla Schrad. However based on the number of differences between these taxa, such as spore size, spore ornamentation and the peridium, Ing (1982) raised the variety to specific rank (see above). The minute size of sporocarps and the fact that it has been often included as a variety in the species L. pusilla makes the distribution of L. pygmaea unclear. As stated above, we agree with Ing (1982) and consider L. pusilla and L. pygmaea to be separate species based on the differences found by SEM in the ornamentation of the peridium and platelet edges, as well as spore colour and size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.648
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207