MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948883243 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.12727236

Ptychognathus similis Mazancourt, Mazel, Marquet, Poupin & Keith, 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6948883243 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsCégep Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoucherKey (lock)Square (algebra)Subway station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ptychognathus similis sp. nov. (Fig. 14A–J, 15A–B) Ptychognathus hachijoensis.— Poupin & Juncker, 2008: 36, fig. 4c–d; 2010: 75, fig. C.— Keith & Marquet, 2011: 64–65.— Keith et al., 2013: 124–125. Type material. Holotype: MNHN-IU-2022-4125 (DNA voucher CA2659), ♂, 9.3 mm × 7.6 mm, Vainifao River, Futuna, Wallis and Futuna Territory, Station 13, 14°18.461'S, 178°8.564'W, coll. J. Poupin & M. Juncker, 14 October 2007. Paratypes: MNHN-IU-2022-4126 (DNA voucher CA2658), 1 ♀, 7.3 mm × 6.1 mm, 5 ♂ 6.4–7.9 mm × 5.6–6.5 mm, 2 ♀ 7.0–7.2 mm × 5.9–6.3 mm, 2 ♀ ovig. 6.6–7.9 mm × 5.2–7.6 mm, same locality data as for holotype; MNHN-IU-2022-4127, 4 ♂, 6.5–15.2 × 5.8–13.2 mm, Vai River, Station 3, 14°15.229'S, 178° 9.192'W, coll. N. Charpin & V. Mazel, 6 August 2023; MNHN-IU-2022-4128, 2 ♂, 6.4–6.6 × 5.5–5.6 mm, 2 ♀ ovig., 10.9–11.4 × 9.6–9.9 mm, Galoli River, Station 5 14°15.574'S, 178°8.305'W, coll. N. Charpin & V. Mazel, 6 August 2023; MNHN-IU-2022-4129, 2 ♂, 13.7–15.3 × 12.5–11.6 mm, 1 ♀, 13.7 × 11.4 mm, Leava River, Station 10, 14°17.598'S, 178°9.543'W, coll. N. Charpin & V. Mazel, 8 August 2023; MNHN-IU-2022-4130, 1 ♂, 9.2 × 7.3 mm, Vainifao River, Station 11, 14°17.085'S 178°8.180'W, coll. N. Charpin & V. Mazel, 9 August 2023; MNHN-IU-2022-4131, 1 ♂, 14.5 × 12.5 mm, Leava River, Station 20, 14°17.498'S, 178°9.305'W, coll. N. Charpin & V. Mazel, 14 August 2023. Comparative material. Ptychognathus hachijoensis Sakai, 1955 (TAIWAN): MNHN-IU-2022-4001 (DNA voucher CA2866), 1 ♂, 9.6 mm × 7.9 mm, 1 ♂, 8.8 mm × 7.3 mm; DNA voucher CA2865, 1 ♀, 10.2 mm × 9.0 mm, 1 ♀, 10.8 mm × 9.2 mm, Gengfang River estuary, Toucheng, Yilan County, coll. J.-W. Hsu et al. Diagnosis. Carapace subquadrate, dorsal surface smooth, flat; front broad, anterior margin slightly concave, frontal width 0.45–0.47 times CW; anterolateral margin with single orbital tooth followed by faint lobe. Third maxillipeds with merus anterolateral angle inflated; exopod broad, inflated, greatest width 1.0–1.3 times median width of ischium. Chelipeds stout, symmetrical in males; fingers with tuft of long setae on outer surface restricted at base of fingers; pulvinus at base of fingers. Ambulatory legs slender, somewhat compressed laterally; propodus and dactylus with dense long setae on posterior margins, glabrous on anterior margins. Description. Carapace (Fig. 14A) subquadrate, slightly broader than long, 1.1–1.2 times as broad as long, flat, dorsal surface smooth, glabrous. Regions poorly defined, central H-shaped grooved distinct; epigastric cristae strong. Front broad, anterior margin slightly concave medially frontal width 0.45–0.47 times CW, fronto-orbital width 0.78–0.84 times CW. Anterolateral margins with single orbital tooth, followed by faint lobe. Posterolateral margins divergent posteriorly, moderately sloping outwards. Infraorbital ridge consisting of several small rounded granules, decreasing in size laterally. Epistome broad (Fig. 14B), median part triangular, margin with tiny granules. Third maxillipeds (Fig. 14C) with ischium subequal in proximal and distal widths, lateral margin concave, ventral surface with longitudinal median ridge. Merus broad, with anterolateral angle expanded; ventral surface with oblique ridge on mesial part. Exopod broad, inflated, greatest width 1.2–1.3 times (male), 1.0 (female) of median width of ischium. Chelipeds (Fig. 14D) symmetrical in male, not granular at all. Merus longer than broad (length to width ratio 1.6–1.7), anterior and posterior margins glabrous, posterior distal margins bluntly carinate. Carpus, unarmed, strongly inflated, slightly longer than wide (length to width ratio 1.1–1.2). Palm much inflated, smooth, without distinct granules; inner surface glabrous. Fingers with tuft of long setae on outer surface restricted at the base of fingers. Dactylus as long as palm, terminating in small, hoof-shaped corneous claw, with 9 or 10 small blunt teeth. Pollex with only faint indication of longitudinal groove, with 4 or 5 blunt teeth. Pulvinus at base of fingers. Female chelipeds (Fig. 14E) distinctly smaller than those of male, chela much narrower than that of male. No tuft of setae on outer surface of fingers. Carpus unarmed. Palm not strongly inflated, dactylus distinctly shorter than palm; narrow hiatus between fingers. Two distinct rows of granules on the palm. Ambulatory legs (P2–5), slender, somewhat compressed laterally; P4 longest (male: length 1.4–1.6 times carapace width, female: length 1.5 times carapace width); P5 shortest. Merus elongated, subrectangular in lateral view, unarmed; anterior margins of merus of P2–4 with long soft setae; posterior margins with sparsely long setae. Anterior and posterior margins of carpus glabrous. Propodus with dense long setae distally on posterior margins and glabrous on anterior margins. Dactylus terminating in subacute corneous claw, with dense long setae on posterior margins and anterior margins glabrous; ventral surface with rows of short setae. P3 merus (Fig. 14F) 2.9 in holotype (2.6–3.2 in paratypes) as long as wide, carpus 2.4 (1.7–2.4) as long as wide, propodus 1.9 (2.0–2.7) as long as wide dactylus 6.3 (4.4–5.4) as long as wide, dactylus 0.8 (0.8–0.9) times as long as propodus. P5 merus (Fig. 14G) 2.2 in holotype (2.1–2.6 in paratypes) as long as wide, carpus 2.0 (1.9–2.3) as long as wide; propodus 1.3 (1.2–1.5) as long as wide dactylus 3.4 (2.2–2.7) 4 as long as wide, dactylus 1.4 (0.9–1.1) times as long as propodus. Male pleon (Fig. 14H) narrow, broadly triangular, nearly smooth, distinctly narrowed at base of telson; margins without short setae. Telson linguiform, margins without setae, terminal margin broadly rounded; length 1.2 (holotype) (1.3 in paratypes) times basal width, 1.3 (1.4) times long as sixth somite, sixth somite 1.5 (1.3) times longer than fifth somite. Female pleon (Fig. 14J) very broad, covering most of thoracic sternum, fourth somite broadest. Telson broadly subtriangular, terminal margin broadly rounded, length 0.42 times basal width, 1.0 times longer than sixth somite. Sixth somite 1.2–1.3 times longer than fifth somite, measured on midline. Small round eggs 0.26–0.28 mm in diameter. Male G1 (Fig. 14I) slender, 5 times as long as wide, slightly curving dorsally reaching suture between thoracic sternite 4 and 5; tip bluntly rounded, forming short chitinous structure; subdistal lobe obtuse, partially obscured by stiff setae. Colouration in life. Body and chelipeds (Fig. 15A) yellowish to brownish or greyish, sometimes reddish (Fig. 15B). Size. Small-sized. The largest male specimen examined is 9.3 mm × 7.6 mm and the largest ovigerous female 7.9 mm × 7.6 mm. Habitat. On Futuna Island, this species is found in rivers in brackish water, near estuaries (Fig. 15C). Distribution. Ptychognathus similis sp. nov. seems to be endemic to Futuna Island (Wallis and Futuna Territory) (Fig. 6). Etymology. This new species is named after its resemblance to P. hachijoensis. Remarks. By the anterolateral margins of its carapace having a single orbital tooth followed by a faint lobe, and by the propodus and dactylus of its ambulatory legs having dense, long setae on the anterior margins, Ptychognathus similis sp. nov. is very similar to P. hachijoensis Sakai, 1955, but it is possible to distinguish them by the width of front (0.45–0.47 times CW vs 0.55–0.56) and by its P5 dactylus (0.8 times as long as propodus vs 1.2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207