Bibliographic record
Abstract
31. Acalypha linearifolia Leandri Notulae Systematicae. Herbier du Muséum de Paris. Phanérogramie. Paris 10: 275 (Leandri 1942). — Type: Madagascar. Prov. Toliara, Ambovombe, Kotoala, 21.I.1931, R. Decary 8423 (lecto-, designated by Montero Muñoz et al. [2018a: 103]: P [P00513090]; isolecto-, S [S07-14664], TAN [TAN000510], US [US01014148]). — Former syntype: Madagascar. Prov. Toliara, delta de la Linta, 17-24.VIII.1928, H. Humbert & C. F. Swingle 5385 (P [P00513086, P00513087, P00513088, P00513089], US [US00096361]). ICONOGRAPHY. — Leandri (1942: 276); Fig. 57C. ETYMOLOGY. — The specific epithet refers to the linear leaf blades characteristic of this species. DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT. — Endemic to Madagascar (Atsimo-Andrefana, Androy, and Atsinanana [one known collection]). Littoral forest and littoral thicket. On unconsolidated sand and Tertiary limestone. Altitudinal range sea level to 10 m (Fig. 50). PRELIMINARY CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT. — Acalypha linearifolia is known from five collections. Its EOO is estimated to be 84 834 km 2 and its AOO 16 km 2. The large EOO is due to one collection presumably made in Toamasina by G. Cours. The other collections are from southern Madagascar. This species grows mainly in littoral forests (see assessment of A. gracilipes). There are no collections made in protected areas. In addition, no specimens of this species have been collected for 70 years, so we cannot rule out that this species has become extinct. Due to habitat loss and the absence of recent collections, A. linearifolia is assigned a preliminary conservation status of Endangered: EN B2ab(ii,iii,iv); although it meets the values needed for a threatened category based on the B2 subcriterion, this species could probably be assessed as extinct (EX). MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 4 collections. Madagascar: Cours, G. 4637 (P[P00324458, P00513085]), 4638 (G, P[P00513084]); Decary, R. 8423 (P[P00513090], S[S07-14664], TAN[TAN000510], US[US01014148]); Humbert, H. 5385 (P[P00513086, P00513087, P00513088, P00513089], US[US00096361]). REFERENCES. — Govaerts et al. (2000: 72); Montero Muñoz et al. (2018a: 103). DESCRIPTION Shrubs, probably evergreen, to 1.5 m tall, monoecious. Branches densely pubescent with stellate trichomes, glabrescent when mature. Axillary buds ovoid, to 1 × 0.7 mm, perulate, perules 2, valvate, membranous, brownish, pubescent with stellate trichomes; Stipules to 1 mm long, lanceolate, pubescent with stellate trichomes, margin with some sessile glands. Petioles to 0.2 cm long, indumentum similar to that on young branches. Leaf blades ericoid, 3.5-4.7 × 0.1-0.2 cm, linear, coriaceous; base acute; apex obtuse to rounded; margin entire, revolute; upper and lower surfaces densely pubescent with stellate trichomes; venation prominent on lower surface, pinnate, secondary veins to 15 per side. Stipels absent. Inflorescences spiciform, male, and solitary female bracts, axillary. Male inflorescences to 1.4 cm long, with glossy exudate; subsessile, peduncle to 2 mm long, pubescent with stellate trichomes; flowers glomerate; bracts orbicular, to 0.5 mm diameter, pubescent with stellate trichomes. Solitary female bracts subsessile, peduncle to 2 mm long, pubescent with stellate trichomes; bract short-petiolate, enlarging in fruit to 4 × 5 mm, suborbicular, densely pubescent with stellate trichomes; margin entire to denticulate, central tooth not prominent; bracteoles absent. Male flowers: pedicel to 0.5 mm long, glabrous; buds to 0.5 mm diameter, pubescent with stellate trichomes. Female flowers 1 per bract, sessile; sepals 3, to 1 mm long, ovate-lanceolate, pubescent with stellate trichomes; ovary c. 1 mm diameter, 3-lobed, papillose, surface pubescent with stellate trichomes; styles not seen. Allomorphic flowers not seen. Capsules to 3 mm diameter, papillose, surface pubescent with stellate trichomes. Seeds c. 2 × 1.8 mm, subglobose, minutely foveolate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".