MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948951835 · doi:10.5063/f1jh3jkz

A global database of chlorophyll and water chemistry in freshwater lakes

2020· dataset· en· W6948951835 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCalifornia Digital Library · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater qualityChlorophyll aGeospatial analysisChlorophyllHydrology (agriculture)Water chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chlorophyll is an important variable used to assess water quality in freshwater lakes around the globe. Using a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature and online repositories, we compiled a database of chlorophyll values. When available, we also aggregated data on lake morphology and water chemistry. Over 3000 published manuscripts were reviewed and 15 online datasets. We obtained 24,483 unique survey in 9625 lakes and 72 countries. Every survey instance had chlorophyll values, and when available other water chemistry variables such as total phosphorus, total nitrogen, dissoved organic carbon, and dissolved oxygen. Within this database, there are files that correspond to the studies that were examined, lake morphology, water chemistry, chlorophyll concentration, and lake information (e.g. location, country, name). The geospatial coordinates that are supply allow for inclusion of variables with raster data such as climate projections, land use, and topography. This dataset can be used for improving our understanding of freshwater equality in response to global change and for management to improve water quality

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it