MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6948971411 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10499419

Eremidrilus gilita Fend & Rodriguez 2020, n. sp.

2020· article· en· W6948971411 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChaetaSpermathecaPharyngeal musclesDorsumPharynxTongue

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eremidrilus gilita n. sp. (Figures 7, 8, 11E) Holotype. USNM 1618768. Dissected worm, incomplete but with sperm in spermathecae and mature egg; slidemounted in Canada balsam, stained with carmine. Type Locality. USA, New Mexico, Catron Co., Gilita Creek at Willow Creek (Site 14, Table 1), in riffle, 22 Apr 1996, collected by S. Fend. Paratypes. From the type locality (Site 14), same collection data; all mature: USNM 1618770, 1 sagittally sectioned worm on 2 slides, stained with hematoxylin and eosin; USNM 1618769, 1 dissected, incomplete. MNCN 16.3 /3115, 1 whole-mount, complete. All slide-mounted in Canada balsam. Etymology. Named for the type locality, Gilita Creek. Noun in apposition. Description. Length of one complete, preserved worm 17 mm, 58 segments. Diameter at clitellum 0.35–0.5 mm. Proboscis 260–480 µm long, about 85–95 µm diameter at middle (Fig. 7A, 8A). Secondary annulation from IV to clitellum (Fig. 7A). Chaetae with nodulus 0.4 to 0.5 from distal end in mid-body, but may be more distal posteriorly; length 112–133 µm, shorter in II (Figs. 7B, 8B). Male pores on the ventral chaetal line, midway between chaetae and posterior septum, on narrow porophores (Figs. 7A,C, 8C,D). Simple spermathecal pores (Fig. 8E,F), behind ventral chaetae, on the ventral chaetal line, the first at 1/3 the distance from posterior septum to ventral chaetae, second close to intersegment 12/13 (Figs. 7C, 8E,H). Female pores intersegmental at 11/12. Epidermis 5–10 µm thick, up to 12 µm in clitellum. Clitellum X to XIII. Pharynx in II–IV, dorsal pad not prominent; pharyngeal glands in IV–VI (VII). Sperm sacs extend anteriorly to VII, posteriorly to XIII or XIV. Egg sacs to XV. Nephridia in several postclitellar segments, terminating in a round vesicle (30 µm wide), anterior to ventral chaetae (Figs. 7C, 8G). Atria 240–340 µm long, entirely in X, club-shaped, maximum diameter 52–77 µm; muscle layer thin, 2–4 µm; epithelial cells cuboidal, to 6–7 µm high. Atrial ampulla covered with a prostate layer, 20–30 µm thick, prostate cells in densely packed clusters (Figs. 7C,D, 8D). Atrium narrows to 20 µm before porophore, and to about 10 µm near the male pore, which opens on a narrowly cylindrical porophore (26–50 µm long, 30–33 µm wide). Atrium length about 9–10 times porophore width, and 0.6–0.7 times body width. Two vasa deferentia per atrium, diameter 19–24 µm, length about 300 µm; posterior vas loops in XI, and both vasa join the atrial muscle layer near the middle, entering the lumen at about one third the distance from tip. (Fig. 7C,D) Spermathecae in XI and XII, ampullae may extend into next segment (Fig. 7C). Ampullae irregular sac-like, epithelial layer about 8 µm thick (Fig. 8E). Ectal ducts of spermathecae 60–90 µm long and up to 50 µm wide, usually tapered to about 20 µm near the pore; muscle layer thin (ca. 1 µm), lining cells somewhat columnar, about 12 µm high; lumen very narrow (Fig. 8F). Spermathecal pores without glands or distinct epidermal modifications. Remarks. The position of the spermathecal pores in line with the ventral chaetae, with the second pair close to intersegment 12/13, is similar to that of other Eremidrilus species having two spermathecal segments. Male pores open on a short porophore, narrower than that of E. humboldti n. sp. and E. allegheniensis (see below), and markedly different in shape from the concave, annular porophore of E. artzaini (a porophore is absent in E. montanensis n. sp.). The small size of the atrium and the thin atrial musculature most closely resemble those of E. humboldti, but in that species the atrium is shorter and the porophore is relatively large (see Table 2). The nephridial vesicles, observed in middle segments, appear more distinctive than those of E. montanensis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesFrench-language works237,207