Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is bug-fix release. The main user-visible changes is that npdim= option of dynesty is removed. Also because of the code change, you will not be able to resume previous dynesty runs from earlier (<2.1.3) dynesty versions. Detailed changelog is below: Get rid of npdim option that at some point may have allowed the prior transformation to return higher dimensional vector than the inputs. Note that due to this change, restoring the checkpoint from previous version of the dynesty won't be possible) (issues #456, #457) (original issue reported by @MichaelDAlbrow, fixed by @segasai ) Fixed Fix the way the additional arguments are treated when working with dynesty's pool. Previously those only could have been passed through dynesty.pool.Pool() constructor. Now they can still be provided directly to the sampler (not recommended) ( #464 , reported by @eteq, fixed by @segasai ) change the .ptp() method to np.ptp() function as it is deprecated in numpy 2.0 ( #478 , reported and patched by @joezuntz) Fix an error if you use run_nested() several times (i.e. with maxiter option) while using blob=True. ( #475 , reported by @carlosRmelo)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.302 | 0.345 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".