MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949037819 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.11333350

Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus Pallas 1778

2005· article· en· W6949037819 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesUlex europaeusPopulationErinaceus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus Pallas 1778 Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus Pallas 1778, Nova Spec. Quad. Glir. Ord.: 30. Type Locality: Not stated; restricted by Trouessart (1910), to Poland (see discussion in Ognev, 1940:140, who further restricted it to SW Poland). Vernacular Names: European Hare. Subspecies:: Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. europaeus Pallas 1778 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. caspicus Hemprich and Erhenberg 1832 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. connori Robinson 1918 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. creticus Barrett-Hamilton 1903 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. cyprius Barrett-Hamilton 1903 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. cyrensis Satunin 1905 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. hybridus Desmarest 1822 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. judeae Gray 1867 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. karpathorum Hilzheimer 1906 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. medius Nilsson 1820 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. occidentalis de Winton 1898 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. parnassius Miller 1903 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. ponticus Ognev 1929 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. rhodius Festa 1914 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. syriacus Hemprich and Ehrenberg 1832 Subspecies Lepus (Eulagos) europaeus subsp. transsylvanicus Matschie 1901 Distribution: Open woodland, steppe and sub-desert: from S Sweden and Finland to Britain, throughout Europe (not Iberian Penin. south of Cantabria and the Ebro River, or south of Siena in Italy), to W Siberian lowlands; south to N Israel, N Syria, N Iraq, the Tigris-Euphrates valley and W Iran. SE border of range (Iran) from S Caspian Sea south to Persian Gulf (54 EE); see Angerman (1983:19). Introduced to Ireland, SE Canada-NE USA, S South America, Australia, New Zealand and several islands, including Barbados, Réunion, and the Falklands. Conservation: IUCN – Lower Risk (lc); however, this once common species is now declining across Europe and a reevaluation of its status is likely to place it in one of the IUCN threatened categories (Schneider, 1997). Discussion: Subgenus Eulagus (Averianov, 1998; Gromov and Baranova, 1981; Gureev, 1964). This species was earlier placed in capensis by Petter (1961 a) based on what was interpreted as a cline in morphological characters (mainly size) from NE Africa eastward across the N Arabian peninsula and the Middle East, and northward through Israel to Turkey. Sympatry between large " europaeus " and small " capensis " (= tolai) in Kazakhstan, without evidence of hybridization (Sludskii et al., 1980) was interpreted as overlapping ends of a Rassenkreis. Angermann's (1983) re-analysis indicated a marked discontinuity between smaller "capensis" (incl. arabicus) and larger europaeus running from the E Mediterranean coast (C Israel) through Iran, and on this basis we separate europaeus from capensis and tolai. East of the border of the range of europaeus in Iran, tolai occurs, apparently in allo- or parapatry with europaeus. Insular populations in the E Mediterranean were assigned to this species (Ellerman and Morrison-Scott, 1951), but need to be reviewed. See also comments under tolai and tibetanus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAfrican history and culture studies→French-language works237,207→