Licea pygmaea Ing, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
20. Licea pygmaea (Meyl.) Ing, Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 78(3): 443 (1982) Figs. 17A–L ≡ Licea pusilla var. pygmaea Meyl., Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci. Nat. 58: 89 (1933) Sporophores sporocarpic, scattered to gregarious, sessile. Sporocarps subglobose to pulvinate, angular, 0.05–0.1 mm diam., brown. Peridium double, outer layer horny, inner layer membranous; dehiscence into platelets along shiny ridges, platelet margins with prominent outgrowths. Spores free, dark olive to dull dark brown in mass, greenish yellow by TL, globose, 12–13 µm diam., minutely evenly warted. By SEM the inner peridium inner surface is warted with different sized warts and some bare patches (Figs. 17 I – J); the platelet margins have different sized outgrowths mostly in a single row but sometimes overlapping, fused and sausage-shaped (Figs. 17 I – J); the epispore is covered with flattened bacula evenly dispersed, sometimes two or more fused (Figs. 17 K – L). Material examined: Lectotypus. SWITZERLAND. Vaud, nr. Ste Croix, La Gittaz, 1250 m, OCT 1930. Myxo 055 (LAU)!. (Designated by Kowlaski, Mycologia 67: 448-494. 1975). Habitat: on bark of living and dead trees, trunks, stumps and debris of angiosperms and gymnosperms. Distribution: Norway, Sweden, Lithuania, Russian Federation, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Poland, Ireland, United Kingdom, France, Spain, Switzerland, Austria, India, Vietnam, Japan, Congo Democratic Republic, USA, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Australia, New Zealand. Icon.: Nannenga-Bremekamp (1965: 140, Figs. 7 B – C, as L. pusilla var. pygmaea; 1975: 66, as L. pusilla var. pygmaea; 1991: 45, as L. pusilla var. pygmaea), Gilert (1996: 517, Figs. 1–2, 5–6; 518, Figs. 7–8, 11–12; 520, Figs. 11–12, 14, all the images as L. pusilla), Lado & Pando (1997: 130, Figs. 37a–b), Yamamoto (2002a: 3. Figs. 1 A – D; 2004: 23, Figs. 3 A – C; 2006: 35, Figs. 15 A – D; 2021: 148, Figs. A – D), Poulain et al. (2011: 70), Ronikier et al. (2017: 253, Figs. 4 G – K), López-Villalba & Moreno (2020: 149, Figs. 3a–d), Johannesen & Vetlesen (2020: 79, Figs 40 A), Bortnikov et al. (2022: 39, Figs. 15a–k). Notes. This species was published by Meylan (1933), as a variety of L. pusilla Schrad. However based on the number of differences between these taxa, such as spore size, spore ornamentation and the peridium, Ing (1982) raised the variety to specific rank (see above). The minute size of sporocarps and the fact that it has been often included as a variety in the species L. pusilla makes the distribution of L. pygmaea unclear. As stated above, we agree with Ing (1982) and consider L. pusilla and L. pygmaea to be separate species based on the differences found by SEM in the ornamentation of the peridium and platelet edges, as well as spore colour and size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.074 | 0.058 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".