MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949115876 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10925881

RISK MANAGEMENT USING DATA SCIENCE APPROACHES

2024· article· en· W6949115876 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRisk managementBig dataPortfolioComponent (thermodynamics)Order (exchange)Risk management frameworkFinancial riskPredictive modelling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Risk management is a vital component in the decision-making process, for instance, in the financial, healthcare and cybersecurity domains. Nowadays, in the time which is the era of explosive growth of data, where the data science approaches have shown to be powerful tools of risk management management. This study reviews using data science techniques to detect, describe, and minimize risk through various sectors. Data science uses advanced algorithms and statistics models to extract valuable insights from large datasets so that organizations can take informed decisions in a risk management process. The algorithms of machine learning have become important tools in the risk management operations because they use the data of the past in order to recognize the trend patterns and predict the outcomes. The technique also ensures the detection of anomalies such as abnormal behaviors or patterns which are considered risks or fraudulent activities. Data science data models are widely implemented in financial to determine credit risks, portfolio optimization or fraud detection. Historical market data and financial indicators can be analyzed by predictive models in order to determine the likelihood of default or to assess the risk/return tradeoff in investment portfolios. By the same token, in healthcare, the data-driven approaches which have the ability to identify patient risks, bring out the best of the available treatment plans, and predict disease outbreaks, are also being used. Moreover, data science plays essential role in cybersecurity, by identifying and preventing cyber threats during the process. Machine learning algorithms, built on the analysis of network traffic, user behaviors and system logs, can point out suspicious activities as well as potential vulnerabilities, consequently increasing the overall security level of the system. The use of data science within the risk management process has a number of advantages, such as better assessment of risk, faster decision-making, and the possibility to proactively deal with risks. However, data quality issues, the explainability of the models, as well as moral concerns are among the safety factors to enable reliable and efficient risk management of the data-based solutions. Eventually the data science techniques utilized in risk management yields the organizations a better grasp of classifying, evaluating, and overcoming risks in different sectors. Utilizing innovative analytical methodologies and smart data applications, organizations will be able to strengthen their ability to react to some uncertainties that they may face and make better decisions at a business atmosphere that is complex and dynamic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInternational Human Rights and Reproductive LawFrench-language works237,207