Supplemental data for "Inequitable spatial and temporal patterns in the distribution of multiple environmental risks and benefits in Metro Vancouver"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DemoEnPoC2016.csv/DemoEnPoC2006.csv: This is a table including environmental and demographic (Census variables) data at postal code level for Metro Vancouver in the year 2006 and 2016. The environmental data (SO2 metrics, PM2.5 metrics, Calculated ozone metrics, NO2 data, NDVI metrics, and Canadian Active Living Environments Index (Can-ALE) indexed to DMTI Spatial Inc. postal codes) were extracted from CANUE (Canadian Urban Environmental Health Research Consortium). The demographic data is extracted from Canadian Census analyzer (https://datacentre.chass.utoronto.ca/), the deprivation index is downloaded from from the Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ). DGRwithLable: This is the Dissemination Geographies Relationship File for the 2021 census year (Statistics Canada, 2021) with the lable of urban or rural, indicating which dissemination area (DA) is identified as urban and included in this study. The urban area is named as population certer. Aggregation and SS Determination: This script contains code for: Aggregating postal code level data to the Dissemination Area (DA) level. Eliminating rural DAs. Converting environmental data into ordinal categories using quartile and even break methods. Identifying sweet and sour spots for each DA based on these methods. SSEJ Analysis: This script includes code for: Creating violin and box plots to illustrate descriptive statistics of demographic groups across different environmental categories (sweet, sour, risky, and medium). Performing linear regression analyses between environmental categories and demographic variables. SS Heatmap: This script comprises code for: Summarizing the results of the linear regression analyses. Assessing changes in inequities among demographic groups between 2006 and 2016. Visualizing regression coefficients through heatmaps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.565 | 0.078 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".