MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949204351 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14286034

Perilampus crassus Yoo & Darling 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6949204351 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ontario Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIridescenceHolotypeDorsumDorsal finGenusSternum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perilampus crassus Yoo & Darling sp. nov. Figs 12, 13 Type locality. USA, Florida, Gainesville. Type material. Holotype. “ USA: FL: Alachua Co.: nr. Gainesville airport, 45 m 29°42'0"N, 82°15'40"W 2. Oct. 2016 A. Baker, A. Knyshov, J. Zhang swp AB 16.028 ". The holotype is point-mounted (Female ROME 182771, UCRC). BOLD: AEE 9250 / ITS 2. ROM Online Collection. Paratypes. USA: 1 female, 2 males. Florida: 1 female, 2 males. Putnam Co., Ordway-Swisher Biol. Station, Rd. C 6: (1 female: ROME 189115 - MCZC; BOLD: AEE 9250; ITS 2. 2 males: ROME 189062 - MCZC; ITS 2; ROME 189063 - MCZC; BOLD: AEE 9250; ITS 2). Material examined. USA: 9 females, 4 males. (Suppl. materials). Additional material examined. Cuba: 1 female. (1 female: ROME 189093 – USNM). Etymology. The specific epithet is the Latin adjective crassus (coarse), in reference to the punctate sculpture on the lateral lobes of the mesoscutum along notaulus. Description. Female (Fig. 12). Length: 3.0– 4.8 mm. Color: head iridescent greenish blue or violet; mesosoma and metasoma iridescent greenish blue or violet; clypeus ventral margin entirely iridescent (Fig. 12 I); antenna with scape and pedicel weakly iridescent greenish blue or violet, flagellum brown or black, lighter ventrad and distad. Head (Fig. 12 G – J): in dorsal view transverse, width slightly greater than twice length, HW / HL 2.1–2.2. Frontal carina: in anterior view straight to weakly sinuate below midlevel of eye; in dorsal view gradually narrowed V shape around median ocellus, FC / MOD 1.5–1.7; distance from lateral ocellus short, FCLO / LOD 0.6–0.7. Scrobal cavity: in anterior view wide, SW / HW about 0.5. Ocelli (Fig. 12 G): a line between anterior margin of lateral ocelli reaching anterior margin of median ocellus or nearly bisecting median ocellus. POL / OOL 1.7–2.1. Ocellar ratios LOD: POL: OOL: LOL 1, 3.1–3.4, 1.5–1.9, 1.1–1.3. Vertex: with strong to weak transverse striations, without large piliferous punctures. Parascrobal area: in lateral view gradually narrowed towards lower eye margin; width narrow, PSW / EL about 0.3; sculpture strongly to weakly striate, without large piliferous punctures. Gena (Fig. 12 J): entirely striate along outer eye margin, striate posterad. Malar space: MSL / EH 0.2–0.3. Lower face (Fig. 12 H, I): with setae sparse laterad torulus, and usually sparse below. Clypeus: CW / CH about 1.4; ventral margin nearly straight; setae evenly distributed, or with small bare area without setae medially. Mesosoma (Fig. 12 B – F, K, L): Lateral panel of pronotum: about as wide as prepectus, LPP / PPT about 0.9; without flange below level of mesothoracic spiracle in posterior oblique view (Fig. 12 D). Mesofemoral depression: smooth, rugulose, weakly imbricate, or imbricate-alveolate (Fig. 12 L). Mesoscutum: punctures angulate, with narrow or slightly wide and weakly coriarious interspaces (Fig. 12 B); lateral lobe strongly punctate with coriarious or smooth interspaces along notaulus (Fig. 12 C); parascutal carina broadly curved, acuminate (Fig. 12 E). Mesoscutellum: apex with inner margins gradually or abruptly diverging (Fig. 12 K); punctures angulate, with narrow or slightly wide and weakly coriarious interspaces. Axilla: in lateral view imbricate dorsad and rugose-areolate (Fig. 12 F) or carinate ventrad. Axillula: smooth dorsad. Fore wing: stigma small, 2.0–2.5 × as wide as postmarginal vein. Male (Fig, 13). Length: usually smaller, 3.0– 3.8 mm. As in female, except: Frontal carina (Fig. 13 D): distance from lateral ocellus as wide or shorter, FCLO / LOD 0.5–0.6. Scape (Fig. 13 G, H): pits sparse, covering about 0.3 × scape length. Diagnosis. Perilampus crassus can be distinguished by a weakly iridescent and nearly straight ventral margin of clypeus (Figs 12 I, 13 E cf. Figs 8 I, 18 I). Also, the lateral lobe of mesoscutum is more strongly punctate along the notaulus than in the other species with punctate sculpture (Figs 12 C, 13 F cf. Figs 4 C, 5 F, 8 C, 9 F). Distribution (Fig. 25 A). Central and southern USA: USA (Arkansas, Florida, Kansas, New Mexico, Texas). Possibly Cuba. Host association. Hosts unknown. Remarks. This species is supported by both genes (Fig. 1, Suppl. material 5), and there are three BINed specimens on BOLD (AEE 9250) from Florida. Only specimens from Florida were successfully sequenced and the degree of intraspecific genetic variability in this species is unclear. A single specimen collected from avocado fruit imported from Cuba (ROME 189093) suggests that the distribution of P. crassus extends to the Greater Antilles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→French-language works237,207→