MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949351165 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15212216

Surirella subrotunda Cvetkoska, Levkov & Hamilton 2014, sp. nov.

2014· article· en· W6949351165 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRapheKeelRidgeMedian planeBarrel (horology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surirella subrotunda Cvetkoska, Levkov & Hamilton sp. nov. (Figs 1–15) Valves isopolar about apical axis, rhombic-elliptic to rhombic with acute apices. Valve length ranges between 35–55 µm and width 22–30 µm. Valve face undulated in apical direction (Figs 1–9), extending from valve margin to median area (Fig. 10), parallel in center to strongly radial towards valve apices (Figs 1–9). Each undulation ridge aligned with alar canal and depressions between connected to fenestrae. Alar canals narrower than fenestrae (Figs 10, 11), 20–30 in 100 µm. Striae fine, not discernible in LM. In SEM, striae uniseriate throughout (Figs 12, 13, 15); stria density 34–38/ 10 µm. Internally, striae present on entire valve face, continuing to space between alar canals (Figs 13, 15). Puncta externally open as simple rounded pores, internally puncta rimmed (Fig. 15). Median area widely lanceolate, short and terminates before valve apices, with fine striation sometimes not visible in LM. Small internal circular to elliptical depression present in median area (Figs 2, 3, 5, 7, 11). Median area a lanceolate raised ridge, covered with short conic spines. Externally, conic spines present on undulations, somewhat longer conic tubes appear at mantle side of alar canals (Fig. 15). Wing projection vertical, positioned close to valve face. Rounded keel with 3–4 silicate grooves extending along both sides of raphe (Figs 12, 14). Externally, raphe fissures deflected towards mantle (Fig. 14); internally, raphe fissures with simple ends (Fig. 13). Fenestrae rectangular, occluded by 4–5 fenestral bars (Fig. 12). Internally, alar canals cylindrical (Figs 11, 13), alar openings simple elliptical portulae (Figs 11, 13). Type:— MACEDONIA: Lake Prespa, sediment, core Co1215, core depth 249 cm, ca. 13.7 cal ka BP, collection date: October 2009 (holotype! slide MKNDC 005419/A, holotype! designated here, Accession No. MKNDC 005419, holotype specimen = Fig. 3; isotypes BRM ZU9/34, CANA 93609). Etymology: —the specific epithet (subrotunda) refers to its similarity to S. rotunda. Observations: — Surirella subrotunda may be compared to S. rotunda Jurilj (1948: 178, fig. 5), an endemic species for Lake Ohrid. The original description of Jurilj (1948) translates in English as: “Valve shape almost circular, valve apices projected. Valve length 80–100 µm, width 60–70 µm. Costae weakly developed, reaching the median line, 14–18 / 100 µm. Valve almost flat, fine striae cover the costae. Additional punctae are irregularly arranged on the valve”. In his description, Jurilj provided a single line drawing of the taxon (reproduced here as Fig. 16). Surirella rotunda was recorded during the observation of Jurilj’s samples from Lake Ohrid (Figs 17–19). The two species can be separated from each other by their valve size: S. subrotunda is much smaller (L= 35–55 µm, B= 22–30 µm) compared to S. rotunda (L= 90–120 µm, B= 65–70 µm). The number of alar canals is 20–30 in 100 µm in S. subrotunda vs. 14–18 in 100 µm in S. rotunda. The shape and size of the median area is smaller and lanceolate to round in S. subrotunda, compared to the linear-lanceolate shape in S. rotunda. The presence of the small circular to elliptical depression in the median area can be considered a unique character for S. subrotunda. S. subrotunda also resembles S. turgida W.Sm. (1853: 31, fig. 9:60), however, it is distinguished by the smaller valves and its isopolar valve morphology. Surirella turgida sensu Krammer & Lange-Bertalot (1988, figs 152: 1, 1A) is easily differentiated by the valve size (L= 70 µm, B= 44 µm in S. turgida). Surirella turgida sensu Hartley et al. (1996, fig 280: 6) has a lanceolate shape and larger valve length (L= 58–80 µm) and narrow linear median area. Surirella turgida sensu Foged (1981, fig. 60: 6, 7) has a comparable valve size, but can be distinguished by the narrow, linear median area. Surirella helissella Jurilj (1954:164 = Helissella glabra Jurilj 1948:16, 17, figs 8a, b) has a comparable valve shape, but has larger valves (L= 95–250 µm, B= 65–100 µm) and conspicuous valve torsion. Surirella bifrons Ehrenberg (1843: 388, figs 3/5: 5, 4/3: 1) sensu Krammer & Lange-Bertalot (1988, figs 145: 2–4, 146: 1–4, 147: 1–5) very likely represents a heterogeneous group of species. The specimen depicted in Krammer & Lange-Bertalot (1988, fig. 146: 3) has a comparable valve outline and shape of the median area, but differs from S. subrotunda by its valve size (L= 130 µm, B= 67 µm) and rostrate apices. There are a number of Surirella taxa with this valve outline, but few SEM images are available to document the species (Gaul et al. 1993, Henderson & Reimer 2003). A complete examination of these elliptical-rhombic taxa is required. Specimens depicted as S. bifrons in the recent diatom flora of Lake Prespa, Levkov et al. (2007, fig 204: 1–6) resemble S. subrotunda in valve length (L= 45–70 µm in S. bifrons sensu Levkov et al. 2007) and the presence of a circular to elliptical depression in the median area. However, the specimens can be distinguished by the valve outline, rhombic-elliptic to rhombic in S. subrotunda and linear-lanceolate in S. bifrons sensu Levkov et al. (2007) and the shape of the median area, widely lanceolate, short in S. subrotunda and linear-lanceolate in S. bifrons sensu Levkov et al. (2007). Surirella subrotunda has been observed only in the fossil diatom assemblages from the sediment sequence Co1215, retrieved from the central northern part of Lake Prespa. According to the age model (Aufgebauer et al. 2012), samples in which S. subrotunda has been observed are dated between ca. 14.8 and 13.2 cal ka BP, 273– 240 cm core depth and correspond to the Bølling/Allerød (B/A) interstadial (cf. Björck et al. 1998).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMusicology and Musical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207