Bibliographic record
Abstract
ANAPHES Haliday, 1833 (Figs 33–39) Anaphes Haliday, 1833a: 268, 1833b: 346. Type species: Anaphes fuscipennis Haliday, 1833, by designation under the plenary powers of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 2017: 122 (ICZN 2017). See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species. Diagnosis. Body almost always uniformly black or dark brown; face without subantennal sulci and toruli less than their height from transverse trabecula (Fig. 33a); antenna with fu 1 shorter than each remaining segment and clava 1- (Fig. 34) or 2-segmented; fore wing with posterior margin straight to distinctly concave, with apex slightly asymmetrical, the anterior margin usually more curved than posterior margin (Fig. 35), almost always uniformly covered with microtrichia except for two more or less distinct bare areas, the marginal and medial spaces, separated by an oblique row of microtrichia extending from just behind apex of stigmal vein towards wing apex (Fig. 35); retinaculum with a socketed seta near apex (Fig. 35); propodeum with median longitudinal sulcus (Fig. 36); petiole short, not visible (Fig. 36); gt 1 a thin, narrow and almost vertical panel longitudinally divided by a median sulcus (Figs 36–38); ovipositor base enclosed in a membranous gastral sac sometimes projecting anteriorly ventral to mesosoma (Figs 37, 39). Remarks. Anaphes belongs to the Anaphes group of genera, a rather poorly defined group containing one other genus, Erythmelus. It differs from Erythmelus in having mandibles with 3 distinct teeth that cross over each other when closed. The most well-known species of fairyfly in the Neotropical region is probably Anaphes nitens (Girault). Before even being identified to genus and species, A. nitens was imported from South Africa into Argentina (Marelli 1928) and Brazil (Ribeiro et al. 2023) to control an introduced Gonipterus sp. (Curculionidae) on Eucalyptus spp. From there it spread to other countries in South America. An additional Australian species of Anaphes, A. tasmania Huber & Prinsloo, was released but so far failed to become established (Ide et al. 2013a) and A. inexpectatus Huber & Prinsloo was being considered for introduction into Brazil (Wilcken et al. 2018) and was introduced into Colombia (Cardeño, 2019). Whether it is successfully established is unknown but it is included here in case its introduction is eventually shown to be successful. Gavio et al. (2024) recorded specimens of an unidntified species from an unknown host in the thalli of a red alga in the marine intertidal zone of a mangrove forest. Neotropical hosts. Coleoptera: Curculionidae. Important reference. Huber & Thuróczy (2018).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.115 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".