MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949367864 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15020998

Euura papillosa ZMUO.

2025· article· en· W6949367864 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType (biology)HolotypeTaxonomy (biology)Type speciesSingle specimen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

199 Euura papillosa (Retzius, 1783) Figs 208, 445 Tenthredo papillosa Retzius, 1783: 72, by indication on Degeer (1771): 982, pl. 37 figs 1–11. Type material lost. Type locality: Sweden. Tenthredo fuscata Christ, 1791: 452, by indication on Degeer (1771): 982, pl. 37 figs 1–11. Type material lost. Type locality: Sweden. Nematus melanaspis Hartig, 1840: 27. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Blank et al. (2009). Nematus lacteus Thomson, 1871: 155–156. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy with melanaspis by Konow (1890). Nematus sulphureus Zaddach, 1876: pl. II figs 6, 14. Description based on larvae: adult ♀ ♂ were described later in Brischke (1883). Type material probably destroyed (Blank & Taeger 1998). Type locality: not stated. Synonymy with melanaspis by Konow (1890). Nematus citreus André, 1880b: 203–204. Syntypes, sex not stated, not located. Type locality: not stated. Synonymy with melanaspis by Konow (1890). Nematus maculiger Cameron, 1882: 538–539. Syntypes ♀ ♂ (BMNH?), not examined. Type localities: United Kingdom; Scotland, Clydesdale and England, Worcester. Synonymy with melanaspis by Konow (1890). Nematus brunnicornis Zaddach, 1883 in Brischke 1883: 136–137. Syntypes ♀ ♂, probably destroyed (Blank & Taeger 1998). Type locality: Poland and /or Germany; Prussia,?Harz Mountains. Synonymy with melanaspis by Enslin (1916a). Pteronidea sveae Lindqvist, 1958: 99–100. Synonymy with melanaspis by Lindqvist (1967b). Diagnosis Dorsally mostly black colouration distinguishes the females from closely related E. pavida (dorsally extensively pale). The pale parts of the abdomen of living E. papillosa females are also usually (always?) green, rather than yellow in E. pavida. Males might not be clearly distinguishable from E. pavida. A mitochondrial genome in GenBank (MZ726800, named as Euura bridgmanii, voucher ZYT-202105-02) that was published as Pontania dolichura (Sun et al. 2022) belongs to E. papillosa. This was confirmed based on the nuclear sequences extracted from the raw Illumina data of the voucher ZYT-202105-02 (NCBI Sequence Read Archive accession SRR15883156). Type material examined Lectotype Nematus melanaspis, here designated GERMANY • ♀; northern Germany [according to Hartig 1840: 22]; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym3345. Lectotype Nematus lacteus, here designated SWEDEN – Skåne • ♀; Lund; 55.71° N, 13.19° E; MZLU, MZLU2017317. Holotype Pteronidea sveae FINLAND – Uusimaa • ♀; Helsinki, Munksnäs [Munkkiniemi]; 60.22° N, 24.89° E; 5 Aug. 1956; E. Lindqvist leg.; MZH, http://id.luomus.fi/GL.3508. Host plants A wide spectrum of species of Salix, Populus tremula (Pschorn-Walcher & Altenhofer 2000), P. nigra L. and hybrid poplar cultivars (Chambers 1952; Chevin & Savina 2016). Genetics COI Based on 29 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 4.92% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 2.74%, is Euura pavida. Nuclear Based on 4 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.57% (0.12% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.62%, is Euura pavida. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Austria, China (only genetics), Finland, Germany, Japan, and Sweden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207