MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949367973 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13681474

NASCENT-stars large program: origin of molecular complexity towards emerging high-mass protostars

2024· article· en· W6949367973 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtostarMolecular cloudObservatoryStarsStar formationKey (lock)TelescopeInterstellar mediumInterstellar cloud

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the star formation process, the interstellar medium gets enriched in a complex zoo of molecules. The extremely rich chemistry of the star forming gas holds the key to constrain the link between the chemistry of disks and their forming planetary systems. It is, however, unclear what are the key physical conditions that influence the emerging complex chemistry, and how the fundamental properties of the emerging star, or stellar clusters impact its evolution. In this context, wide-band receivers open a new era by allowing us to perform quasi-instantaneously spectral surveys that are required for a more robust estimation of molecular abundances. The NASCENT-stars project (PI: Csengeri) is a large observing program started in 2023 at the IRAM NOEMA observatory with 228 hours allocated at the telescope making use of the newly commissioned high spectral resolution (250 kHz) and wide-band observing mode. Overall, we observe a 46.5 GHz non-continuous bandwidth to characterize the physico-chemical conditions of the most active star forming regions of the Cygnus-X molecular complex at the scale of 1400 au probing statistically significant samples individual protostellar envelopes. I would like to highlight the first results of NASCENT-stars and our efforts to develop artificial intelligence and machine learning methods facilitating the exploitation of these rich datasets. Results of this project should pave the way to the spectacular science cases enabled by the ALMA WSU.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→