MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949371240 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1303960

smallAreaHealthStatisticsUnit/algae: Code for the ALGAE Protocol

2018· other· en· W6949371240 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsPublic Works and Government Services Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortCohort studyProtocol (science)Longitudinal studyPregnancyLongitudinal dataMedical record

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Longitudinal birth cohort studies often assign environmental exposure during pregnancy based on residential address of the mother at the time of birth. This might lead to exposure misclassification due to residential mobility during pregnancy. Inaccurate or incomplete address records in cohort studies may be a further source of exposure misclassification. We developed an ALGorithm for Generating Address Exposures (ALGAE) to provides a generic and adaptable, open-source solution to clean addresses stored in a cohort contact database and assign life-stage specific exposure estimates with the potential to reduce exposure misclassification. This study was supported by the UK Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust (Grant ref.: 102215/2/13/2). The work presented here was specifically funded by The UK Medical Research Council: "Effects Of Early Life Exposure To Particulates On Respiratory Health Through Childhood And Adolescence: ALSPAC Birth Cohort Study", Grant Ref: G0700920.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2590.079

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207