Bibliographic record
Abstract
CAMPTOPTERA Foerster, 1856 (Figs 55–61) Camptoptera Foerster, 1856: 116, 119. Type species: Camptoptera papaveris Foerster, 1856, by monotypy. See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species. Diagnosis. Funicle 7-segmented with fu 2 ring-like, much shorter than fu 1 or fu 3 (Fig. 56); mandible with 1 tooth (Fig. 55a); head posteriorly with median coronal sulcus extending from vertexal suture to postorbital sulcus, and transoccipital sulcus extending from above foramen laterally to below eye (Fig. 55b); fore wing narrow, with posterior margin concave and wing apex slightly but usually distinctly curved (Fig. 57), usually with one longitudinal row of microtrichia; petiole narrow and slightly longer than wide (Figs 58–61), sometimes with a laterally projecting lamella at about midpoint; metasoma in dorsal view sometimes cone-shaped (Fig. 59a). Remarks. Camptoptera belongs to the Camptoptera group of genera. The curved fore wing with concave posterior margin is unique. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Extralimital confirmed hosts are Coleoptera. Important reference. Ogloblin & Annecke (1961), Huber & Lin (1999).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".