Análisis diacrónico aspectual-cognitivo de la construcción progresiva verbal del inglés
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo se desarrolla un análisis cualitativo de la construcción progresiva verbal inglesa apartir de una muestra del conjunto de corpus York-Toronto-Helsinki-Penn, en aras de ilustrar lospatrones de cambio semántico-aspectual que experimenta esta construcción a lo largo de sudesarrollo diacrónico. Se elabora un análisis cognitivista que indica la persistencia de lasconfiguraciones aspectuales propias de la categoría progresiva del inglés actual desde los períodosmedievales. En este análisis, el concepto de gradiente lingüístico parece explicar las diferencias enlas conceptualizaciones que caracterizan a la categoría en cada período en virtud de la estructuraformal de la construcción.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it