Anisocyrta perdita Haliday 2018
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anisocyrta perdita Haliday, 2018 Figs 7–8 Alysia perdita Haliday, 1838: 241; Thomson 1895: 2298–2299. Anisocyrta perdita; Marshall 1895: 368–369; Shenefelt 1974: 956; Belokobylskij 1998: 286–287, 2003: 357. Material examined. 1 ♀ (ZJUH), China, Hebei, Mt. Xiaowutai, Jinhekou, 23.viii.2005, Zhang Hongying, No. 200609041. Short redescription. Body brown (Fig. 7); body length of ♀ 2.9 mm, length of fore wing of ♀ 3.7 mm, antenna yellowish brown, incomplete, with 24 antennomeres remain (Fig. 8O); mandible yellowish, with fourth tooth distinctly visible (Fig. 8L); pronope shallow and small (Fig. 8I), side of pronotum (partly) granulate anteriorly (Fig. 8C); mesoscutum smooth, shiny and glabrous; notauli absent; medio-posterior depression rather long, elliptica (Fig. 8D); vein m-cu of fore wing slightly postfurcal, vein issued at base of pterostigma, vein 1-SR of fore wing 1.6 × vein 3-SR (Figs 8A–B); legs rather yellowish; length of first tergite of metasoma 1.1 × longer than apical width (Fig. 6F); length of ovipositor sheath 0.5 × as long as fore wing and 1.5 × the body (Fig. 6G). Biology: Unknown. Distribution. Austria, Canada, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Italy, Mongolia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Russia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, China (Hebei, Ningxia). Ningxia is a new record.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".