Bibliographic record
Abstract
Belothrips morio Reuter Belothrips morio Reuter, 1899: 45. This species was based originally on a single female from Stockholm, but both sexes are distinguished from acuminatus in the key to European Terebrantia by zur Strassen (2003), who gives the distribution as “ Russia, Scandinavia, East Central Europe”. The web site of the Senckenberg Museum indicates the presence of only a single slide of morio, but through the courtesy of Nikolai Ignatev of that Museum seven slides bearing the identification morio by zur Strassen were found in the Senckenberg collections (Fig. 16). These seven slides bear specimens from Finland, Sweden, Poland, Czech Republic and Western Canada, and this record of morio from Canada, Alberta, was published by Chiasson (1986: 53). However, Canada was not mentioned by zur Strassen (2003) although that record includes the only male of morio available. The character states used in the 2003 key to distinguish morio are far from robust, particularly considering the few specimens available all of which lack host data. The validity of the species will remain in doubt until further information becomes available, such as good population samples and host data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".