MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949429290 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15859274

Compsilura concinnata

2023· article· en· W6949429290 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyphantriaFar EastLarvaLymantria disparNymphalidae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compsilura concinnata (Meigen, 1824) (Fig. 3A) For taxonomical and morphological characters of this species see Tschorsnig and Herting (1994) and Tachi et al. (2021). Material examined. Iran, Guilan province, Rezvanshahr, Paresar, Sandian, (37°57′22.70″ N, 49°12′82.95″ E), 02.ix.2019, 190♂, 222♀; on larvae of Hyphantria cunea, leg. A. Karami. Distribution in Iran. Guilan (Ghahari, 2017; current study), Mazandaran (Ghahari, 2017), Fars (Gheibi & Ostovan, 2010), Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad (Saeidi, 2011) provinces. General distribution. Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Australia (New South Wales, Queensland), Azerbaijan, Belgium, Canada (introduced) (British Columbia, East, Ontario, Prairies), China, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, England, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iran, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Lithuania, Malaysia, Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, Netherlands, Nigeria, North Korea, Palestine, Papua New Guinea, Poland, Romania, Portugal, Russia (Eastern Siberia, Western Russia, Western Siberia), Serbia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, USA (introduced) (California, Great Plains, Northeast, Pacific Northwest), Uzbekistan, former Yugoslavia, (Cerretti & Ziegler, 2004; Tschorsnig et al., 2004; Vanhara & Tschorsnig, 2006; Stanković et al., 2014; O’Hara et al., 2020; Hammami et al., 2022) (Fig. 4F). Hosts. Lepidoptera: Hyphantria cunea (Drury, 1773), Lymantria dispar (Linnaeus, 1758) Leucoma salicis (Linnaeus, 1758), Euproctis chrysorrhoea (Linnaeus, 1758); Orgyia trigotephras Boisduval, 1829, Ocneria terebinthina Stgr. (Erebidae); Cydalima perspectalis (Walker, 1859) (Crambidae); Hemileuca oliviae Cockerell, 1898 (Saturniidae); Thaumetopoea jordana (Staudinger, 1894, T. solitaria (Freyer, 1838), T. pityocampa (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775), T. ispartaensis Doğanlar & Avcí (Notodontidae); Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg, 1775), Nymphalis antiopa (Linnaeus, 1758) (Nymphalidae); Thiacidas postica Walker, 1855, Mythimna unipuncta (Haworth, 1809); Dicycla oo (Linnaeus, 1758) (Noctuidae) (Halperin, 1990; Sabahi, 1997; Camerini & Groppali, 1999; Dehghani Zahedani et al., 2006; Farar, 2006; Al-e-Mansoor, 2008; Saeidi, 2011; Stanković et al., 2014; Ghahari, 2017; Tschorsnig, 2017; Farahani et al., 2018; Martini et al., 2019; O’Hara et al., 2020; Hammami et al., 2022).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy→French-language works237,207→