Dolichogenidea rociocordobae Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault 2025, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dolichogenidea rociocordobae Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault sp. nov. Figs 121 A – F, 161 B Type material. Holotype. Costa Rica • Female, CNC; Alajuela, Area de Conservación Guanacaste, Sector San Cristobal, Sendero Huerta; 10.9305, -85.3723; 527 m; 14.xii.2012; Elda Araya leg.; Host: Dichomeris Janzen 703; Voucher code: DHJPAR 0051131; Host voucher code: 12-SRNP-5560. Paratypes. Costa Rica • 1 Female, 1 Male, CNC; DHJPAR 0051072, DHJPAR 0051084. Diagnostic description. T 1 and T 2 heavily sculptured with strong longitudinal striae; T 1 length <1.5 × T 1 width at posterior margin; T 2 rectangular, covering most surface of tergum; ovipositor sheath almost as long as metatibia length (0.95 ×); F 15 1.2 × as long as wide; metafemur mostly brown; metatibia dark brown to black on posterior 0.5; body length: 2.50 mm; fore wing length: 2.60 mm. Among all species with heavily sculptured T 1 and T 2, T 1 comparatively broad and T 2 rectangular, D. rociocordobae can be distinguished by the color of metafemur and metatibia, and length of F 15. The only species closely similar morphologically is D. frankjoycei which has slightly shorter ovipositor sheath and slightly longer F 15, as well as different hosts and DNA barcode. Distribution. Costa Rica. Biology. Solitary. Gelechiidae, Dichomeris Janzen 273, Dichomeris Janzen 703. DNA barcoding data. BIN BOLD: ACJ 2777 (7 sequences, 7 barcode compliant). Etymology. Named in honor of Sra. Rocio Cordoba (MS) of San Jose, Costa Rica, in recognition of her own decades of efforts in the World Bank on behalf of Costa Rica’s environment as well those of her husband Dr. Jorge Cortes for the same cause.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".