Pseudohemihyalea sonorosa Schmidt 2009, sp. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pseudohemihyalea sonorosa Schmidt, sp. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: E93D6C4F-07C4-42AF-97EE-2C283679E945 Figs. 4, 9, 15, 20, 22, 25 Type material. Holotype – ♁, Mexico, Sonora, Mesa Compañera, 12 mi. w. Yecora, 2600 m, 10-14 Sep 2004, P.A. Opler [CNC]. Paratypes. 2 ♀♀, same data as holotype [CSU]; 1♁, 4♀♀, Same locality as holotype, 10 sep 2004, leg. Bowman and Opler [DEB]. Diagnosis. This species is superficially most similar to P. ambigua and P. potosi sp. n., but P. sonorosa can be separated from both by its significantly larger size, distinct pink hindwing cast, and late flight period (September vs. June-July). Internally, the uncus is 1.4 x longer than that of P. ambigua, averaging 1.8 mm compared to 1.3 mm in P. ambigua; the uncus has a deeper, narrower basal cleft than P. ambigua (cf. Figs. 15 and 11); compared to P. potosi sp. n., P. sonorosa has an elongate, not triangular saccular process, and a much longer and narrower valve overall (cf. Figs. 9 and 10). The male vesica is covered in hair-like spines, unlike the small thorn-like cornuti of all other ambigua- group species. In females, the corpus bursae is nearly 3 x as large as the bulla seminalis (fig. 22), compared to about 1.5 x in other members of the ambigua -group. Description. Head – male antenna strongly bipectinate, longest rami about 6.0 x longer than segment length; dorsal antennal scales pale rusty brown; vestiture of palps mostly pink with a few rust scales, frons and vertex rust, pinkish red bordering patagia. Thorax – vertex of thorax, patagia and tegulae rusty tan, tegulae slightly paler mesially; ventrally, thorax rusty tan tinged with pink; legs rusty tan, pink dorso-medially. Forewing – length (♁) 26.1 mm (n = 2), (♀) 31.2 mm (n = 2); intervenal areas ivory white, sparsely scaled, semi-translucent; veins broadly lined with rusty tan; fringe and costal margin tan-lined, anal margin with narrow white border; pattern similar ventrally but colours appearing washed-out. Hindwing – sparsely scaled, semi-translucent, pale pink; anal margin more densely scaled with pink scales. Abdomen – pink dorsally, pale tan ventrally; coremata absent. Male genitalia – uncus shaped like a bicycle saddle, i.e., with broad, bilobed base and tapering, finger-like apex; basal lobes heavily setose dorsally, apical portion slightly wider than median, with a spade-shaped dorsal profile; apex bluntly pointed, slightly down curved; division between costal and saccular processes extending slightly less than one-third of total valve length; apex of costal process bluntly rounded, tapering more gradually dorsally than ventrally; saccular process rounded-triangular, tapering to rounded apex; vinculum a short, broad scobinate conical projection; juxta urn-shaped in outline, with medial keel along dorso-ventral axis; saccus short, extending slightly cephalad beyond tegumen; aedeagus without spines; vesica simple, globose, lacking spines but with very fine indistinct cornuti. Female genitalia – lamella antevaginalis broad, flangelike, caudal margin concave; ductus bursae sclerotized, 2 x longer than wide and strongly flattened dorso-ventrally; corpus bursae simple, globose-ellipsoidal, signa lacking; ductus seminalis arising dorsally from caudal part of bursa near junction with ductus; bulla seminalis globose, approximately 1/3 diameter of corpus bursae when inflated. P. ambigua P. syracosia P. sonorosa P. potosi P. fallaciosa P. fallaciosa & P. syracosia Biology and distribution. The immature stages are unknown. Pseudohemihyalea s onorosa flies in upper elevation pine-oak forests of the Sierra Madre Occidental, Mexico during September. It is known only from the type locality, in the state of Sonora. Remarks. The name sonorosa is derived from both its occurrence in the state of Sonora and its pronounced rose-coloured hindwings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".