Bibliographic record
Abstract
PeLtIS Müller, 1764 This genus is restricted to the Northern Hemisphere. Three species are known from the United States, none of which were recorded as occurring in Montana by Barron (1971, 1996). Barron’s (1971) lack of Montana records, however, was most likely an artifact of collecting as he indicated that species of this genus are widely distributed in the western United States and Canada. Barron (1996) reviewed Nearctic Peltis (as Ostoma Laicharting), and changed certain names he had used previously (Barron 1971): the Nearctic members of his 1971 Holarctic Ostoma ferruginea (Linnaeus) were recognized as Ostoma fraterna (Randall), while Ostoma columbiana Casey was placed as a junior synonym of Ostoma septentrionalis (Randall), thus leaving only Ostoma pippingskoeldi (Mannerheim) unchanged among the Nearctic fauna. Although Kolibáč (2013) cited Barron (1996), he missed these nomenclatural changes, and used Barron’s (1971) interpretation in his checklist. This should be considered a lapsus calami, not a nomenclatural change, as Kolibáč (2013) did not include Barron (1996) in his synonymical table. I therefore follow Barron’s (1996) species-level taxonomy here. Kolibáč (2013) stated that all species of Peltis are fungivorous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".