MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949471853 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13887860

Protocypraea SCHILDER 1927

2023· article· en· W6949471853 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleogeneCretaceousBayAperture (computer memory)Shell (structure)Archipelago

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PROTOCYPRAEA? SP. 1 FIGS. 5P, 6A–C Eocypraea sp. Williams et al., 2018: unnumbered fig. Hypotype— CDM 997.91.3 (figs. 5P, 6A–C), length 48.1 mm, width, 31.4 mm, height 25.3 mm, height. Informal locality AP3 (J.W. Haggart, personal communication, 2022). Occurrence— Questionably late Paleocene (Thanetian Stage), central east coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. Oyster Bay Formation (“Appian Way beds”), approximately 45.5°N, intertidal area on east coast of Central Island District, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. Description— Shell moderately large, smooth, turnipshape, base narrow, aperture narrow, dentition relatively small size. Shell tapers rapidly anteriorly; anterior part of shell somewhat projected. Shell with maximum width posterior to center of shell, but very inflated posterior area incomplete showing only small depressed area (only base of spire present) with sunken sulcus area. Aperture is moderately wide and fairly straight, with some bending in posterior area. Outer lip shows numerous relatively small-sized teeth anteriorly. Inner lip similar, except for the teeth being smaller and not extensive. Remarks— Only a single specimen (possibly a juvenile) is known. It is nearly complete, except for most of the broken-off posteriormost part of the shell, thus precluding the assignment of this unnamed specimen. This specimen, which is the northernmost occurrence of a Paleogene cypraeoidean in the NEP region, is like no other NEP Paleogene cypraeoidean, nor like any NEP Late Cretaceous specimen. A manuscript currently in preparation by J.W. Haggart et al. will further document this so-called “Appian Way fauna” [presumably of late Paleocene age and contemporaneous with the “Oyster Bay Formation”], Central Island District, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. McLachlan and Pospelova (2021) presented dinoflagellate data for an early Paleocene age of the “Oyster Bay Formation,” but that age is in contradiction to late Paleocene to middle Eocene ages variously based on plants, sporomorphs, marine mollusks, decapods, and shark teeth (see McLachlan and Pospelova 2021 for a review of this literature).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→