MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949473476 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15576983

Understanding Near-Ground Tornado Flows - Pressure, Shear and Turbulence, and their Importance in Structural Loading (ERIES-TNG)

2025· dataset· en· W6949473476 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHistory of Computing Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsTornadoVortexWind speedFlow (mathematics)Wind tunnelInstrumentation (computer programming)PerpendicularRADIUS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dataset Description The research focuses on the velocity and pressure field of the near-ground region within one of the Wind Engineering, Energy, and Environment (WindEEE) Dome's tornadic-like flow simulations. This research also aims to provide valuable insight in the behaviour between tornado-building interactions. Measurement regions of interest range from the apparent centre of the tornado-like flow structure extending beyond twice the radius of maximum tangential velocity. Two vortex cases were simulated and measured: (1) TV0 - a stationary vortex where the bell mouth (updraft centre) aligns with the centre of the test chamber, and (2) TV1 - a vortex translating for a distance of 4.5 m at a nominal translation speed of about 1-1.2 m/s. S0. Documentation Contains information documents regarding the instrumentation specifications, test plan, and other important diagrams. S1. Near-Ground Flow Model TV0 and TV1 simulations were tested at the WindEEE Dome testing facility. Velocity measurement devices were used to characterize simulated vortex's horizontal flow field at heights of 3.2, and 7.2. Pressure measurement devices were used to characterize the vortex's ground surface pressure. These measurements aim to provide data for more accurate tornado wind field models. E1. Near-Ground Velocity Field During this test, 3-D point measurements were taken to aid in characterizing TV0 and TV1 simulations. Measurements were taken at locations R = 0, 60 and 105 cm measured perpendicularly from the bell mouth's path of translation. Two heights and four point positions were captured at each location. These measurements aim to provide detailed characteristics of the wind field. E2. Ground Surface Instantaneous Pressure Field A ground surface pressure model covering an area of 120 cm by 300 cm was used to characterize the ground pressure distribution of simulations: TV0 and TV1. Instantaneous pressure measurement devices captured the flow distribution throughout a 2-D grid of pressure taps mounted flush with the ground surface panels. S2. Low-Rise Building Model A 3:12 roof slope, 1:100 scale, low-rise building model was instrumented with external surface pressure taps and tested under TV0 and TV1 flow simulations at WindEEE. The low-rise building model was measured in locations R = 0, 60, and 105 cm measured perpendicularly from the bell mouth translation pat, and at azimuth angles 0, 45, and 90 degrees relative to the path of the bell mouth. E1. Low-Rise Building Aerodynamics The effects of stationary and translating vortices on a low-rise building model were investigated. S3. Small-Portable Temporary Building Model A temporary low-rise building was instrumented with external surface pressure taps and tested under TV0 and TV1 flow simulations at WindEEE. The small-portable building model of size 1.2 cm by 1.2 cm by 3.2 cm (1:70 scale) and ground surface model covering 120 cm by 300 cm. The small-portable building was measured in locations R = 0, 60, and 105 cm measured perpendicularly from the bell mouth translation path. E1. Small-Portable Temporary Building Aerodynamics The effects of stationary and translating vortices on a small-portable building model were investigated. S4. Near-Ground Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) A Continuum laser was focused and split through a cylindrical lens into a thin laser sheet, fog machines were used to seed the entire test chamber with long lasting fog fluid, and finally synchronized high-resolution cameras (flares) were used to capture laser light refraction. Flares send image data to the DVR Express Cores during test measurements. This PIV system was used to measure the horizontal velocity field of simulations: TV0 with an approximate total coverage of 80 cm by 240 cm. E1. Near-Ground Horizontal Velocity Field The PIV system was used to measure the 2-D velocity field at a height of 7.2 cm from the chamber floor. The plane of measure covers regions from the tornado-like flow's apparent centre to beyond the region of maximum tangential velocity. E2. Low-Rise Building Wake Aerodynamics A low-rise building model was measured at the centre of the test chamber, subject to the tornado vortex TV0. The model was made black to absorb energy and light from the PIV laser. The PIV system was used to measure the 2-D velocity field at a height of 7.2 cm from the chamber floor. Note: Due to storage limitations we cannot include the entire PIV raw dataset, however data can be made available apon request. Please email the project contact person or the hosting instution (Contact – WindEEE Research Facility) for information or access to the complete dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHistory of Computing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207