Bibliographic record
Abstract
288 Euura malaisei (Hellén, 1970) Figs 301, 530 Decanematus longiserra Malaise, 1931b: 31–32.Secondary homonym of Nematus longiserra Thomson, 1863 [= Euura longiserra (Thomson, 1863)]. Amauronematus malaisei Hellén, 1970: 7. Replacement name for Decanematus longiserra Malaise, 1931. Diagnosis Females are most similar to E. erecta: see differences mentioned under that species. Penis valves are very similar to E. leucolena and E. rectiserra. Dorso-apically, the valviceps might be more expanded in E. malaisei than in E. leucolena and E. rectiserra. Female 5.0 (6.5) mm. Head black; labrum black or brown; clypeus black; supraclypeal area black; thorax black; pronotum black; tegula black; pterostigma centrally paler than externally; metafemur black or apically pale; metatibia brown or pale; hind tarsus black; abdomen black; hypopygium black or posteriorly slightly pale; valvifer 2 at least partly pale or brown; tergum 9 black to extensively pale; tergum 10 black or slightly pale; valvula 3 basally slightly pale; cerci pale with darkened tip; mesepisternum slightly matt; valvula 3 long, in dorsal view gradually narrowing, with acute tip. Male 4.0– 4.5 mm. Head black; labrum black or brown; clypeus black; supraclypeal area black; thorax black; pronotum black; tegula black; pterostigma centrally paler than externally; metafemur black or apically pale; metatibia brown or pale; hind tarsus black; sternum 9 pale; mesepisternum slightly matt; projection of tergum 8 small. Type material examined Holotype Decanematus longiserra RUSSIA – Kamchatka oblast • ♀; Klutchi [Klyuchi]; 56.32° N, 160.85° E; R. Malaise leg.; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006442. Notes Holotype length 6.5 mm, or 6.9 mm including valvula 3. Host plants Salix glauca, S. lanata. Genetics COI Based on 6 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 3.75% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0%, is Euura leucolena. Nuclear Based on 6 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.59% (0.51% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.17%, is Euura erecta (ZMUO.063230). Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, and Russia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.093 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".