MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949483202 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13799894

Orcinus ater

2024· article· en· W6949483202 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType localityHolotypeMammalTaxonomy (biology)Marine mammalTable (database)Single specimenIndigenous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orcinus ater (Cope in Scammon, 1869) Etymology In Latin, ater means black or dark, which probably refers to the largely black colour of this species. Synonymy Orca ater Cope in Scammon, 1869: 22; original designation. Common name We are planning on engaging with North American Indigenous tribal groups and expect to eventually have a consensus common name, but in the meantime, we suggest continued use of ‘resident killer whale’ so as to maintain consistency. Type specimen USNM 594672 No type specimen was preserved from the original description [125], so we have designated a neotype. The neotype is a physically mature male (total length 698 cm) in the U.S. National Museum of Natural History Marine Mammal Collection. The skull (CBL 1019 mm) is deposited under museum number USNM 594672 and was collected by C.H. Fiscus, H. Kajimura and M. Keyes on 28 February 1967. The skull was previously in the NOAA National Marine Mammal Laboratory collection as NMML 0089. It is illustrated in figure 7 b. mtDNA control region haplotype (160 bp) ‘SR’ [SWFSC ID 39071 in 142] unambiguously identifies this specimen as a resident killer whale. Skeletal morphological analysis of this specimen was included in Fung [103]. Detailed measurements of the type specimen are in electronic supplementary material, table S2. Type locality The neotype specimen was collected in Yukon Harbor, Puget Sound, Washington, USA (lat: 47.53, lon: −122.52). Diagnosis Resident killer whales are slightly smaller than Bigg’s, with total lengths not exceeding 725 cm in a moderate sample [103,143,145]. They have a shorter-based, more falcate dorsal fin that tends to be more rounded at the tip. The post-dorsal fin saddle patch generally does not extend forward much past the mid-point of the dorsal fin base. Individuals show a variety of saddle patch types, including closed (with no invasion of black), open (with a large invasion of black extending from above) and cupped (with a small ‘scoop’ or notch of black invading the saddle from above; e.g. [40, 79]). These correspond to all five patch types of Baird and Stacey [22]. Resident killer whales have smaller and more gracile skulls than Bigg’s, with the following measurements showing significantly lower average values: condylobasal length, postorbital width, occipital width, width of rostrum at base and length of mandible [103]. While individual measures show modal differences with some overlap, PCA of both cranial and mandibular morphology resulted in distinct clusters for Bigg’s and resident species ([103]; figure 2). Genetic analyses of mtDNA are diagnostic, based on fixed sequence differences (table 1), while nuDNA allele frequency differences allow diagnosis based on cumulative assignment probability (e.g. assignment tests or PCA; figures 3 and 4). Description This is a species of killer whale, reaching total lengths of at least 725 cm in males and 644 cm in females [145]. The basic killer whale body plan includes a robust, spindle-shaped body, with a tall dorsal fin positioned at the centre of the back, large paddle-shaped pectoral fins, wide flukes with a slightly convex trailing edge and a blunt head (figure 8 b). There is a short, poorly defined beak. This species shows extreme sexual dimorphism, with males growing much longer and heavier than females; males also develop a tall (up to 2.25 m [149,150]) erect dorsal fin that may actually cant forward (making it look like it was put on backwards), and much larger flukes and pectoral fins. There is a straight mouthline, ending in a slight downturn at the gape. Resident killer whales show the basic colour pattern found in all members of the genus: most of the body is dark grey to black, with a white ventral field that branches into lobes extending up and back along the caudal peduncle. There are large white post-ocular patches, and a light grey to white ‘saddle patch’ originating behind the dorsal fin. The undersides of the flukes are mostly white, as is the entire lower jaw, but the flippers and dorsal fin are black on both sides. There are 10–14 large, conical teeth in each tooth row [144]. Comparison to other taxa The resident killer whale is one of three proposed species of killer whales (genus Orcinus) globally. It is endemic to the North Pacific Ocean and adjacent seas, and it preys primarily on bony fish, especially North Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. (as opposed to marine mammals and elasmobranchs). It can be distinguished from other killer whale species and ecotypes by its genetic profile, its morphology and colouration (see Diagnosis above), and also acoustically. Distribution Resident killer whales occur in inshore and continental shelf waters, primarily from Oregon in the eastern Pacific to eastern Russia and northern Japan in the western Pacific [48,54,147,148,151]. Pods occasionally move southwards down the U.S. west coast to as far as Monterey Bay, CA [152]. They also inhabit the Okhotsk Sea and the southern Bering Sea (figure 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAmerican Environmental and Regional History→French-language works237,207→