MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949519010 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15753295

Parapterogramma poeciloptera Kuwahara & Marshall & Luk 2025, comb. nov.

2025· article· en· W6949519010 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPost-Communist Economic and Political Transition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeSetaDorsumThorax (insect anatomy)KeelBristle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parapterogramma poeciloptera (Papp, 2008) comb. nov. Minialula poeciloptera Papp, 2008: 92, figs 93–102, 320. Minialula poeciloptera – Marshall et al. 2011: 249. — Hayashi 2011: 69. Type material Holotype TAIWAN – Taipei • ♂; Fu-Shan Long Term Ecological Research Site; 27 Mar. 2003; L. Papp leg.; along/over a small river; HNHM. Paratypes TAIWAN – Taipei • 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀; Han-Lo-Dé; 450 m a.s.l.; 29–30 Mar, 2003; L. Papp leg.; forest undergrowth; HNHM • 2 ♂♂; Pinling; 319 m a.s.l.; 17 Apr. 2003; L. Papp leg.; over/along Jinggualiao River; HNHM. Material examined Holotype photo provided by Petra Szöllősi-Tóth, HNHM. Redescription BODY. Length 1.4–1.8 mm. Head dark brown, lower portion of frons reddish with silvery microtomentum on interfrontal plates, orbital plates, and occiput. Antenna with a rounded dorsal conus. Thorax dark brown. Scutum with pale grey and brown microtomentum forming five pale longitudinal stripes.Anterior dorsocentral bristles separated by 8–10 rows of acrostichal setulae. Legs dark brown, femora apically and tibiae proximally yellow, fore and hind basitarsomeres whitish. Mid tibia with two anterodorsal and two posterodorsal bristles on proximal half; male mid tibia with long hair-like apicoventral seta only. Wing pattern strong. CS2 0.6× CS3. R 2+3 distinctly sinuate, angled at ~40° to costa; costa extending just beyond apex of R 4+5 (~1 × costal width). M 1 extending beyond dm-m as a very faint crease; M 4 indistinct beyond dm-m; CuA+CuP long and tubular. Halter pale brown with dark stem. MALE ABDOMEN. S5 broad, uniformly long-setose, slightly desclerotized and setulose posteromedially. S6 with a posteriorly-projecting setulose lobe located behind posteromedial emargination of S5. Surstylus long but low, bilobed: anterior lobe elongate, bare, and sharply bent posteroventrally into a V-shape, posterior lobe rounded and setose. Postgonite short but broad, bent at about midlength, apical half with two rounded, posteroventral triangular lobes flanking a rounded ventral emargination (exaggerating depth of emargination), apex broadly rounded. Phallapodeme elongate, apex curving downwards and pointed; basiphallus large, subtriangular in lateral view and V-shaped in dorsal view, with an elongate, apically rounded and downturned epiphallus. Distiphallus stout, largely membranous, supported by curled, weakly sclerotized lateral sclerites. FEMALE ABDOMEN. T3–5 and S2–5 shortened but broad. T6 and T7 well-developed, rectangular; T8 split into two lateral plates. Epiproct largely reduced. S6 and S7 well-developed, rectangular; S8 trapezoidal. Hypoproct largely reduced. Spermathecae stout, subcylindrical, and smooth with a large, broad but not deep, apical invagination, stem short and membranous. Distribution Indomalayan: Japan (Hayashi 2011), Taiwan (Papp 2008). Remarks The above redescription of Pa. poeciloptera is based on Papp’s (2008) description, Hayashi’s (2011) redescription, and a photo of the holotype. This species, along with Pa. continentalis and Pa. tropicalis, form a distinct clade of similar species formerly treated as Minialula (see above). Parapterogramma poeciloptera has a long, hair-like apicoventral seta on the male mid tibia, unlike the stout apicoventral mid tibial bristle of Pa. continentalis and Pa. tropicalis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPost-Communist Economic and Political TransitionFrench-language works237,207