Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lepanus Balthasar, 1966 Lepanus Balthasar, 1966: 177; Matthews 1974: 100; Gunter & Weir 2019a: 41; Gunter et al. 2019: 459. Type species Lepanus ovatus Balthasar, 1966 (by original designation). Panelus (Parapanelus) Balthasar, 1966: 180. Type species Panelus (Parapanelus) gressitti Balthasar, 1966 (by monotypy). Synonymy by Matthews (1974). Phacosomoides Balthasar, 1966: 178. Type species Phacosomoides curvipes Balthasar, 1966 (by original designation). New synonymy. Paraphacosomoides Balthasar, 1968: 92. Replacement name for Phacosomoides Balthasar, 1966, not Phacosomoides Martínez & Pereira, 1959. New synonymy. Pseudophacosoma Paulian, 1975: 241. Unnecessary replacement name for Phacosomoides Balthasar, 1966. New synonymy. Oficanthon Paulian, 1985: 227. Type species Oficanthon mirabilis Paulian, 1985 (by original designation). Synonymy by Gunter et al. (2022). Comments. Paraphacosomoides is a monotypic genus here treated as a junior synonym of Lepanus. Both genera are described in Balthasar (1966), Lepanus appearing on page 177, Phacosomoides appearing on page 178. For a generic description of Lepanus, refer to Matthews (1974) and Gunter et al. (2019).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".