Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lasionycteris noctivagans (Le Conte, 1831) Silver-haired Bat The distribution of L. noctivagans, although occurring throughout most of the United States and southern Canada, is not well known in the southern portion of its range (Bee et al. 1981; Caire et al. 1989; Davis and Schmidly 1994). Caire et al. (1989) reported only four specimens from four counties. Since then, records were reported for Cimarron County (Dalquest et al. 1990), McCurtain County (Sheffield and Chapman 1992), and Beaver and Oklahoma counties (Braun and Revelez 2005). New records are reported for Caddo and Le Flore counties. Specimen records (3).— Caddo County (2): 6 km N Wichita Mountains National Wildlife Refuge, Blue Canyon II Windfarm, Slick Hills, 623.9 m, 34°51'45.74"N, - 98°36'28.62"W (OMNH 59658); 6 km N Wichita Mountains National Wildlife Refuge, Blue Canyon II Windfarm, Slick Hills, 600.1 m, 34°52'19.64"N, - 98°36'47.76"W, 1 (OMNH 59659). Le Flore County (1): 6.1 km W Cedar Lake Recreation Area, Ouachita Wildlife Management Area, 1 (UCOCV-MAM 2124).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".