Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pasiphaea tarda Kroyer, 1845 (Figures 3B, 5) Pasiphaea tarda Krøyer, 1845: 453; Matthews & Pinnoi 1973: 139; Hayashi 2006: 234–237; De Grave & Fransen 2011: 259; Rodrigues & Cardoso 2019: 324. Pasiphaea princeps — Rathbun 1904: 23. Pasiphaea principalis Sund, 1913: 6; De Man 1920: 2. Material Examined. 1 female (cl 59.4 mm), ReviZEE-Score Norte, 04°07'5"N, 049°5'24"W, Amapá state, 517 m, muddy bottom (Labcrus: 76.2.1A). Distribution. Eastern Atlantic Ocean: Oxsund, South Faeroes, Norway (Sognefjord), Southwest Ireland (Sund 1913); Southern Canary Islands (Hayashi 2006); Angola (d’Udekem d’Acoz 1999). Western Atlantic Ocean: South Greenland (Krøyer 1845); East Labrador, North of Andenes, West of Lofoten (Sund 1913); South Carolina, USA (Hayashi 2006); Brazil (Amapá [Fig. 5], Espírito Santo) (Rodrigues & Cardoso 2019). Depths from 250 to 2400 m. Comments. The material herein examined agrees with the description of Hayashi (2006) and the diagnosis of Rodrigues and Cardoso (2019) in all characters including the rostrum with a basal slit and the apex distinctly overreaching anterolateral margin of carapace (Fig. 3B); the merus of the first and second pereopods with 4–8 and 13–24 spines, respectively; and the posterior margin of telson being forked.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".