Dolichogenidea heredia Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault 2025, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dolichogenidea heredia Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault sp. nov. Fig. 62 A – G Type material. Holotype. Costa Rica • Female, CNC; Heredia; 10°17'N, 84°10'W; 1,400 m; J. Helava leg.; Voucher code: CNC 1180108. Diagnostic description. Hind legs tarsal claws simple; T 1 and T 2 heavily sculptured with strong longitudinal striae (but T 2 striae sparser, with small smoother area centrally); T 1 more or less parallel-sided but comparatively narrow, ~ 2.0 × as long as wide at posterior margin; T 2 comparatively broad, its width at posterior margin ~ 2.5 × its length medially; ovipositor sheath length 1.3 × metatibia length; pterostigma mostly pale yellow-brown but with thin brown margins; metacoxa dark brown on anterior 0.7 and yellow on posterior 0.3; metatibia with dorsal dark brown band on entire length of metatibia; body length: 3.25 mm; fore wing length: 3.41 mm. Among all species with heavily sculptured T 1 and T 2, this species is distinctive by its T 2 slightly less sculptured (especially centrally), metacoxa and metatibia color, ovipositor sheath length and pterostigma mostly pale colored but with thin brown margins. Distribution. Costa Rica. Biology. No host data available. DNA barcoding data. No data. Etymology. Named after the type locality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".