PESKY PESTS: Climate Change and Pest Interactions in Ontario Vineyards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When examining the effects of climate change on viticulture, changes to grape physiology, and cultivar adaptation should be considered, along with the implications of grapevine pest interactions. We assess the spotted lanternfly and potato leafhopper in Canada, exploring their distribution, development, and environmental and economic implications. While the potato leafhopper feeds on over 200 agricultural host plants, the spotted lanternfly is a potential future invader, spreading rapidly across the United States of America (1). Predictive niche models and experimental studies on high temperature tolerance suggest further range expansion on a global scale, potentially including Ontario. Spotted lanternfly introduction to the United States of America will be used as a reference point to extrapolate potential outcomes of establishment in Ontario. Pest management strategies and preventative measures will further be explored while emphasising the importance of reducing invasion phenomena. Climate change is an enduring concern, and effective vineyard protection from infestation requires both prevention and mitigation measures. Pests are ecologically destructive and economically costly; thus, governments must continue to research this issue to prevent further pest proliferation and downstream harm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".