Bibliographic record
Abstract
258 Euura semilactea (Zaddach, 1883) Figs 265, 475 Nematus semilacteus Zaddach, 1883 in Brischke 1883: 185. Holotype ♀, probably destroyed (Blank & Taeger 1998). Type locality: Poland, Gdansk [Danzig]. Diagnosis This is the only species in the group with a black pterostigma, but otherwise the colour pattern can be indistinguishable from E. variator. Males are also best distinguished from the others in the group by their black pterostigma. Penis valves are very similar to E. toeniata (toeniata group), which also have a black pterostigma, but have completely or mostly black underside of the abdomen and completely or nearly completely black metafemur (completely or nearly completely pale underside of abdomen and metafemur black only dorsally in E. semilactea). Host plants Salix caprea (Vikberg & Kontuniemi 1971), but also S. aurita, S. repens, S. cinerea (Enslin 1916b), and S. myrsinifolia (this study). Genetics COI Based on 3 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 4.41% and the nearest neighbours, diverging by a minimum of 0%, are Euura fasciata and E. variator. Nuclear Based on 3 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.51% (0.15% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.37%, is Euura variator. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Bulgaria, Finland, Germany, Norway, Russia, and Sweden.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".