Bibliographic record
Abstract
PLATYFRONS Yoshimoto, 1990 (Figs 252–256) Platyfrons Yoshimoto, 1990: 79. Type species: Platyfrons helavai Yoshimoto, 1990, by original designation. Diagnosis. Face without subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus and with a pit medially next to each torulus (Fig. 252a); toruli separated by about 2× their own height from transverse trabecula (Fig. 252a); propleura narrowly abutting each other anterior to prosternum; scutellum anteriorly with a deep sulcus at level of each notaulus extending from transscutal articulation posteriorly for a short distance (Fig. 255); fore wing usually with a wide dark band beyond venation (Fig. 254); propodeum with widely spaced and diverging submedian carina dorsoanteriorly, separated posteriorly by a transverse carina from the more closely spaced and parallel ventroposterior submedian carinae (Fig. 255); the two sets of carinae form a distinct angle at their junction (best seen in lateral view), petiole apparently attached posteriorly to gt 1 (Fig. 256). Remarks. Platyfrons belongs to the Polynema group of genera. The only similar genus in configuration of the propodeal carina is Polynemula, which differs in the ovipositor projecting distinctly anteriorly ventral to the mesosoma. The short, deep sulcus on the scutellum posterior to each notaulus does not occur in Polynemula, which suggests that Platyfrons is generically distinct from Polynemula. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Important reference. Yoshimoto (1990).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".