MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949649736 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14597169

Gonatocerus Nees 1834

2024· article· en· W6949649736 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicHemiptera Insect Studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvipositorApex (geometry)SetaSimple eye in invertebrates

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GONATOCERUS Nees, 1834 (Figs 147–151) Gonatocerus Nees, 1834: 192. Type species: Gonatocerus longicornis Nees, 1834, by monotypy. Diagnosis. Gonatocerus is distinguished by the following combination: vertex with 2 setae between lateral ocelli (Fig. 147b); mandibles of normal length, with 3 distinct, equal teeth and crossing when closed; pronotum divided medially by longitudinal suture and the lobes abutting medially (Fig. 150) except sometimes slightly separated dorsally; fore wing relatively narrow, with apex evenly rounded, and with microtrichia usually as dense posterior to venation as distal to venation (Fig. 149); stigmal vein with apex usually slightly oblique; dorsellum diamond-shaped (Fig. 150); propodeum with faint, converging sublateral lines, or lines absent (Fig. 150); pronotal spiracle about same size as propodeal spiracle (Fig. 150); ovipositor not produced anteriorly under mesosoma. Remarks. Gonatocerus belongs to the Gonatocerus group of genera, treated formally as Gonatocerini by Huber (2015a). Gonatocerus appears to be most similar to Cosmocomoidea. Useful features that help distinguish Gonatocerus species are: fu 2 and fu 3 usually slightly the longest funicle segments and apex of fu 2 often oblique. The dorsellum margins are sometimes lighter in colour than the rest of the dorsellum. Otherwise, Gonatocerus is more difficult to characterize than the other genera in Gonatocerini. Neotropical hosts. Hemiptera. Important references. Triapitsyn et al. (2010), Huber (2015a).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHemiptera Insect StudiesFrench-language works237,207