Bibliographic record
Abstract
GONATOCERUS Nees, 1834 (Figs 147–151) Gonatocerus Nees, 1834: 192. Type species: Gonatocerus longicornis Nees, 1834, by monotypy. Diagnosis. Gonatocerus is distinguished by the following combination: vertex with 2 setae between lateral ocelli (Fig. 147b); mandibles of normal length, with 3 distinct, equal teeth and crossing when closed; pronotum divided medially by longitudinal suture and the lobes abutting medially (Fig. 150) except sometimes slightly separated dorsally; fore wing relatively narrow, with apex evenly rounded, and with microtrichia usually as dense posterior to venation as distal to venation (Fig. 149); stigmal vein with apex usually slightly oblique; dorsellum diamond-shaped (Fig. 150); propodeum with faint, converging sublateral lines, or lines absent (Fig. 150); pronotal spiracle about same size as propodeal spiracle (Fig. 150); ovipositor not produced anteriorly under mesosoma. Remarks. Gonatocerus belongs to the Gonatocerus group of genera, treated formally as Gonatocerini by Huber (2015a). Gonatocerus appears to be most similar to Cosmocomoidea. Useful features that help distinguish Gonatocerus species are: fu 2 and fu 3 usually slightly the longest funicle segments and apex of fu 2 often oblique. The dorsellum margins are sometimes lighter in colour than the rest of the dorsellum. Otherwise, Gonatocerus is more difficult to characterize than the other genera in Gonatocerini. Neotropical hosts. Hemiptera. Important references. Triapitsyn et al. (2010), Huber (2015a).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".