MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949698175 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15021171

Euura nitidipleuris

2025· article· en· W6949698175 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSchool Choice and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeApex (geometry)InvaginationPenisType speciesSternum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

289 Euura nitidipleuris (Malaise, 1931) Figs 299, 521 Amauronematus nitidipleuris Malaise, 1931b: 45. Lectotype designated below. Amauronematus temporalis Hellén, 1970: 34. Syn. nov. Diagnosis Apically extensively pale abdomen but black tegula and pronotum, short valvula 3, strongly curved lancet with 16–18 annuli, and size (6.0–8.0 mm) should enable identification of the female. Male has pale sternum 9, black tegula and pronotum, and unique penis valve (1.5 mm, small valvispina, paravalva basally and apically similarly broad, broad apex of pseudoceps, small invagination between valvispina and broad and round lobe of paravalva). Penis valves of E. acuminalis and E. annulata are similar, but in addition to some differences in the shape of the paravalva (more elongate or basally narrower than apically), males of these species are extensively pale. When he compared Amauronematus temporalis with nitidipleuris, Hellén (1970) relied on Lindqvist (1945), who apparently misinterpreted nitidipleuris. According to Lindqvist’s drawing (1945: fig. 4), nitidipleuris has a straight lancet, but at least the lectotype has a curved lancet, as in the type of temporalis. The COI sequence (458 bp) of the studied male (http://id.luomus.fi/GP.110187) is identical to a 130 bp fragment from the holotype of temporalis, and matches the sequenced larva rather well (1.09% different) and differs clearly from the other species by a minimum of 6.55%. Type material examined Lectotype Amauronematus nitidipleuris, here designated RUSSIA – Kamchatka oblast • ♀; Klutchi [Klyuchi]; 56.32° N, 160.85° E; R. Malaise leg.; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006358. Holotype Amauronematus temporalis FINLAND – South Ostrobothnia • ♀; Alavus; 19 May 1937; A. Saarinen leg.; MZH, http://id.luomus. fi/GL.2476. Host plants Unknown, but probably Salix like the other species in the group. Lindqvist (1953) reported two reared specimens from Salix (mentioned also by Kontuniemi 1960), but because he had apparently misinterpreted nitidipleuris earlier (Lindqvist 1945), the specimens might represent a different species in the group. The larva sequenced here was swept from a mixture of Salix and Betula nana. Genetics COI Only one sequence (1087 bp) available, from a larva. The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 5.78%, is Euura viduata. Nuclear Only one sequence available, from a larva with haplotypes diverging by 0.21%. The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 1.15%, is Euura erecta (ZMUO.063230). Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, and Russia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSchool Choice and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207