MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949702503 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14170305

Halamphora vantushpaensis Yilmaz, Solak & Gastineau 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6949702503 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLichen and fungal ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRapheDorsumHookRest (music)Long axis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Halamphora vantushpaensis Yilmaz, Solak & Gastineau sp. nov. Figs 2, 3, 4 LM (Figs 2 A – M). Valves semi-lanceolate, dorsiventral with arched dorsal margin and slightly tumid ventral margin. Valve ends protracted and capitate in larger specimens (Figs 2 A – F); but less protracted and not clearly separated from the rest of the valve in smaller specimens (Figs 2 G – M), ventrally bent. Valve length 24.0–42.0 µm, valve width 4.0–5.0 µm (n = 35). Axial area very narrow, wider on the ventral side. Central area visible in larger specimens: indistinct on the dorsal side, semi-lanceolate on the ventral side. Raphe almost straight, slightly arched, appearing to be located near the median line of the valve or slightly dorsal in valve view (Fig. 2). Sometimes the proximal raphe endings can be seen to be slightly dorsally bent (Fig. 2 B). Striae hard to resolve in LM, dorsally slightly radiate over the entire valve (see SEM images for clearer demonstration of this), 27–32 in 10 µm. SEM (Figs 3 A – F, 4 A – F, 5 A – J). Externally, the valve face is arched, merging gently into the mantles (Figs 3 B, 4 B, C, 5 H). Raphe ledge narrow and linear, present on the dorsal side of the raphe, with a prominent groove separating it from the valve face. The proximal raphe endings are slightly expanded into central depressions and are dorsally deflected (Figs 3 B, 4 B, 5 H). The distal raphe endings are dorsally deflected and hook around to link with the groove bordering the raphe ledge (Figs 3 C, 4 C, 5 J). The striae are simple and uniseriate, containing small round or slightly elongate poroids (Figs 3 B, 4 B, C, 5 H), which are somewhat irregularly spaced (Fig. 4 B, 5 H and see also the internal views in Figs 3 E, 4 E, 5 B, E). The internal view of the valve shows the overall structure (Figs 3 D, 5 A). The central area is easier to detect than the external area and appears symmetrical and large on the dorsal side in larger specimens (Fig. 3 E, 5 B); but very small on both sides in smaller specimens (Fig. 4 E, 5 E). Proximally, the raphe terminates within a fused central helictoglossa (Figs 3 E, 4 E, 5 E). The distal raphe endings are slightly deflected ventrally and terminate in well-developed helictoglossae (Figs 3 F, 4 F, 5 C, F). Internally, the poroids have round to elliptical internal openings (Figs 3 E, 4 E, 5 B, E). These characteristics are summarized and compared with those of similar species in Table 1. Phycobank. http://phycobank.org/104935. Holotype. Slides number SZCZEY 2167 in the collection of Andrzej Witkowski at the University of Szczecin, Poland. Valves representing the holotype population here illustrated in Fig. 2 D. Isotype. Slide number TR_Erciş_Van_2021 deposited in Kütahya Dumlupınar University (Türkiye). Type locality. Erciş Van, Turkey (39°00'07.9"N, 43°25'40.4"E) leg. Elif Yılmaz, 31 July 2021. Etymology. The species is named with regard to both Lake Van and the city of Tushpa, capital of the Iron Age kingdom of Urartu, which was located in the vicinity of the lake. Distribution. The presence of this taxon has been assessed and confirmed at four different stations around Lake Van: Ahlat (North West of the lake), Adilcevaz (North), Erciş (North East), and Edremit (South East).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicLichen and fungal ecology→French-language works237,207→