Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leuctra triloba Claassen, 1923 Notes This species is commonly referred to as the Three-Lobed Needlefly (Stark et al. 2012), and has been previously reported from Quebec and New York south to Alabama and Florida (Grubbs 2015, DeWalt et al. 2024). Harper and Harper (1997) reported a fall emergence of this species, but no information is available on the habitat or microdistribution of this species. Our limited data from historical collections in New York indicate a similar emergence with dates ranging from mid-September through October (Fig. 13). Elevations for L. triloba in New York range from 125-340 m asl (Fig. 14). This species appears to be relatively uncommon at its northernmost range limits. A single record is available from southern Quebec (Harper and Hynes 1971 a) and in New York State this species has not been recollected since its original description from the type locality in Ithaca and another nearby locality in the late 1800 ' s. Both state records reside in Level IV Ecoregion Finger Lakes Uplands and Gorges (60 d) (Fig. 16 d). Less frequent collection efforts during autumn and early winter may account for the paucity of records from New York.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".