MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949746062 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3788969

Xyloryctidae Meyrick 1890

2010· article· en· W6949746062 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCanadian Food Inspection AgencyRoyal Alberta MuseumCalgary Laboratory ServicesNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNearctic ecozoneSubfamilySpecies richnessTaxonomy (biology)GenusAridCommon species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

25. Xyloryctidae – teardrop moths Small (12–18 mm wingspan) moths with narrow lanceolate wings. Most species have dark wings and rather wide bodies relative to those of other narrow-winged groups. Adults rest with the wings folded around the body in the shape of an elongate teardrop. Many species are diurnal. Th e larvae of most species construct webs from which they feed on leaves. A few species are miners. The family Xyloryctidae consists of approximately 1200 described species worldwide. Species richness is particularly notable in arid regions. Forty-two species are known in North America, all in the subfamily Scythridinae, which was considered a separate family before Hodges (1999a). Six species are known to occur in AB. The family was revised for North America by Landry (1991), who estimated that only 10% of Nearctic species had been described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicLepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy→French-language works237,207→