Bibliographic record
Abstract
ACMOPOLYNEMA Ogloblin, 1946 (Figs 1–5) Acmopolynema Ogloblin, 1946: 286. Type species: Stichothrix bifasciatipennis Girault, 1908, by original designation. See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species. Diagnosis. Face without or with faint subantennal sulcus ventral to each torulus and without a pit medially next to each torulus (Fig. 1); toruli separated by at least their own height from transverse trabecula; propleura widely abutting each other anterior to prosternum; fore wing usually with one or two dark transverse band distal to venation, the bands usually with some discal setae with enlarged bases (Fig. 3); parastigma without a proximal macrochaeta but with a distal macrochaeta, and marginal vein absent; petiole attached posteriorly to gs 1; propodeum with Vshaped median carinae (Fig. 4). Remarks. Acmopolynema belongs to the Polynema group of genera. Acmopolynema has a short transverse trabecula extending medially anterior to each lateral ocellus that appears to be unique. The V- shaped propodeal carinae (rarely very short) are also unique. Neotropical hosts. Hemiptera: Cercopidae, Delphacidae, Membracidae. Important references. Fidalgo (1989), Yoshimoto (1990).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".