Paradysagrion sosbyae Archibald & Cannings, 2024, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paradysagrion sosbyae sp. nov. ZooBank Registration number: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: AC2D2DFA-47B2–46C6–8EE3- B564791E4C72 Figure 2 Type material. Holotype SR 23-005 - 003 A and B (part and counterpart) by monotypy. The well-preserved distal half of a wing found by Emmalin Sosby, 28 May 2023, at exposure B4131 of the Tom Thumb Tuff Member of the Klondike Mountain Formation in the village of Republic, Washington. Housed in the Stonerose Interpretive Center collections, Republic, Washington. Diagnosis. See genus diagnosis. Description. Holotype wing. As in genus diagnosis and: dark, hourglass-shaped fascia in pterostigma region; postnodal, postsubnodal crossveins not aligned. C–RA space apical to pterostigma close to half the width of adjacent RA–RP1 space. Etymology. The specific epithet is derived from the surname of Emmalin Sosby, who found and donated the fossil, in recognition of her contribution. Gender, feminine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".