MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949790241 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3229758

D3.5 NDS Final Design Document

2017· article· en· W6949790241 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLight effects on plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsGreenhouseCrewModular designSoftware deploymentControl (management)Reliability (semiconductor)ProductivityRemote control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The EDEN ISS nutrient delivery system (NDS) is based on proven horticultural management technology. While some system aspects are relatively new, they will not impact the overall reliability of operation. Similarly, the control system that will operate the NDS and other subsystems is based on Argus<br> Controls (Surrey, BC, Canada) hardware, which has been a greenhouse control and environment<br> management standard since 1984.<br> The bulk of the NDS hardware is contained within the FEG, a 6 meter insulated shipping container<br> equipped with eight growing racks holding a total of forty-two plant growth trays covering 11.9<br> square metres of growing space. The system was designed to grow lettuce, herbs, pepper, tomato<br> and cucumber and will supply the Neumayer Station III crew with fresh produce during operation.<br> Plants will be grown in recirculating nutrient solution that has both pH and electrical conductivity<br> (EC) control. Water will be delivered to the modular growing trays using a hybrid aeroponic/nutrient<br> film technique (NFT) from two nutrient tanks located in the service section. While the NDS in itself<br> uses reliable and proven hardware and growing techniques, the challenges of remote deployment in<br> the Antarctic will provide the needed operational and productivity data required for future missions<br> to the Moon or Mars<br>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicLight effects on plantsFrench-language works237,207