MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949806199 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4655642

Megaraphidia klondika Archibald & Makarkin 2021, sp. nov.

2021· article· en· W6949806199 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeType localitySternumManusIntraplate earthquake

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Megaraphidia klondika sp. nov. Figs 5– 7, 10E, F Type material. Holotype SR 03-01-01 (part), UWBM 97073 (counterpart), collected by Wes Wehr, 13.v.2003, deposited in the SR collections (SR 03-01-01) and UWBM collections (UWBM 97073). An overlapping forewing and hind wing, both almost complete, slightly damaged. Other material. SR 16-004-001.01 (only part), collected by Joanne West, 13.vi.1998, locality the same as holotype, deposited in the SR collections. An apical well-preserved portion of a wing. SRUI 99-71-63 (part and counterpart), 28.iv.2017, collected by Gregg Wilson at the same exposure, 28.iv.2017, deposited in the SR collections. A well-preserved middle portion of a hind wing. Type locality and horizon. Tom Thumb Tuff Member of the Klondike Mountain Formation, exposure A0307, Republic, Washington, U.S.A.; early Eocene (Ypresian). Etymology. The specific epithet is an adjective referring to the Klondike Mountain Formation shale within which its specimens are preserved. Diagnosis. May be distinguished from other species of Megaraphidia by branch of RA within pterostigma very poorly or not visible [clearly visible in M. elegans, M. exhumata]; costal space strongly dilated in forewing (2.9 times wider than subcostal space) [2.3 in M. antiquissima, 2.0 in M. hopkinsi, M. ootsa]; two doi approximately equal in length in hind wing [proximal doi shorter than distal in M. antiquissima, M. ootsa, M. hopkinsi]; two pectinate branches of CuP in hind wing [one in M. hopkinsi, M. antiquissima]. Description. Holotype. Forewing 12.4 mm long, approximately 3.9 mm wide (length/width: 3.2). Costal space broad, strongly dilated at proximal 1/4 length; eight preserved subcostal veinlets simple (probably nine to ten total), three basal veinlets more closely spaced. ScP relatively long, terminating on costal margin slightly distad crossvein 2ra-rp; length from termination of ScP to pterostigma approximately equal to length of pterostigma. Subcostal space broad, with basal crossvein located in middle between origin of RP, divergence of M, CuA; distal crossvein (2scp-r, forming basal margin of pterostigma) slightly incurved. Pterostigma relatively short, strongly pigmented. Two RA branches (none detected within pterostigma); one forming distal margin of pterostigma; other distad pterostigma; none forked. RA joining margin well before apex. RA space with two crossveins forming two radial cells: 2ra-rp located well proximad pterostigma, slightly proximad termination of ScP; 3ra-rp located in middle of pterostigma along RA. RP originates at nearly half (0.44) wing length, with five pectinate branches: RP1 deeply dichotomously forked twice; other branches forked once. One long intraradial crossvein rp1-rp2 between stem of RP, RP1. Three crossveins between RP, MA: 1r-m, 2r-m connecting stem of RP, MA; 3r-m connecting RP1, anterior branch of MA. M close to R (appears fused) for considerable distance, and then fused with CuA for short distance; forked well proximad origin of RP. MA deeply dichotomously forked twice. MP zigzagged, anterior trace with three simple branches (proximal-most branch fused basally for long distance with CuA). Two intramedian crossveins form two doi, approximately equal in length. Cu basally not visible; dividing to CuA, CuP relatively close to wing base.Anterior trace CuA strongly zigzagged, fused with MP for long distance to form part of posterior margin of basal doi, and then with proximal-most branch of MP; two pectinate long simple branches, their bases close). CuP simple, aligned with Cu. Crossvein icu between CuA, CuP long. AA1 with shallow fork near margin; AA2, AA3 simple. One short crossvein iaa in anal space, between AA1, AA2. Hind wing 11.6 mm long, approximately 3.5 mm wide (length/width: 3.3). Costal space relatively broad (incompletely preserved); four preserved simple subcostal veinlets, widely spaced. ScP relatively long; length from termination of ScP to pterostigma slightly shorter than length of pterostigma. One crossvein detected in subcostal space (2scp-r, forming basal margin of pterostigma), slightly incurved. Pterostigma elongate, slightly longer than in forewing. RA with two branches (one presumably within pterostigma not detected); branch forming distal margin of pterostigma slightly curved; one simple branch distad pterostigma; portion of RA distad pterostigma relatively short. Three crossveins between RA, RP: 1ra-rp located slightly distad 2r-m; 2ra-rp located clearly proximad termination of ScP; 3ra-rp terminating within pterostigma, just proximad its middle along RA. RP originating 0.39 wing length, with five pectinate branches, two proximad 3ra-rp, three distad. RP1 deeply dichotomously forked twice; other branches rather deeply forked once each. One intraradial crossvein rp1-rp2 between RP1, RP2. Three crossveins between R, M: 1r-m very long, subparallel to R connecting to RP near its origin (its base unclear); 2r-m connecting stems of RP, MA; 3r-m connecting RP1, anterior branch of MA. M forked proximad origin of RP. MA deeply dichotomously forked twice. MP: anterior trace zigzagged, simple, with three simple, pectinate branches. Two intramedian crossveins forming two doi, approximately equal in length. Two crossveins between M and Cu: basal 1m-cu long, very oblique, connecting M, CuA; 2m-cu straight, perpendicular to MP, connecting it, CuA.Anterior trace of CuA probably simple distally, with two simple branches (incompletely preserved). One crossvein (icu) between CuA, CuP long. CuP originating very closely to wing base; fused with AA1+2, then AA1 for long distance. AA1 basally fused with AA2 for long distance. AA3 simple. Jugal vein stout. SRUI99-71-63 (Fig. 6). Hind wing 7.7 mm long as preserved (11 mm estimated length), 3.5 mm wide as preserved (approximately identical to estimated width). Costal space relatively broad (incompletely preserved); five preserved subcostal veinlets (three distal-most simple), widely spaced. Subcostal space narrow proximally, broadened distally; no crossveins, pterostigma preserved. Distal part of RA not preserved. Two crossveins between RA, RP preserved: 1ra-rp located slightly distad 2r-m; 2ra-rp located clearly proximad termination of ScP. RP originates far from wing base, with only RP1 partially preserved. One intraradial crossvein (rp1-rp2) detected, between RP1, RP2 near its origin. Three crossveins between R, M: 1r-m very long, subparallel to R connecting to RP near its origin (its base unclear); 2r-m connecting stems of RP, MA; 3r-m connecting RP1, anterior branch of MA. M forked proximad origin of RP. MA deeply dichotomously forked twice. MP: anterior trace zigzagged, simple, with three simple, pectinate branches. Two intramedian crossveins forming two doi, approximately equal in length. Two crossveins between M and Cu: basal 1m-cu long, very oblique, connecting M, CuA; 2m-cu straight, connecting it, CuA. Anterior trace of CuA simple distally, with two probably simple branches (incompletely preserved). Small distal portions of CuP, AA1 preserved. SR 16-004-001-01.01 (Fig. 7, 10F). Distal part of wing preserved, 5.7 mm long, 3.4 mm wide. Pterostigma elongate, 1.72 mm long (along costal margin), 0.47 mm wide (length/width: 3.66). RA with three branches: one within pterostigma indistinct; branch forming distal margin of pterostigma slightly curved; one simple branch distad pterostigma. Portion of RA distad pterostigma relatively short (along costal margin), 0.63 length of pterostigma. Two crossveins between RA, RP preserved; 3ra-rp located in distal part of pterostigma. RP with five pectinate branches, two proximad 3ra-rp, three distad. RP1 rather deeply forked; its anterior branch simple, posterior forked. Other branches forked once each. One intraradial crossvein rp1-rp2 between origin of RP1, RP2. Two crossveins between R, M detected: 2r-m connecting stems of RP, probably MA; 3r-m connecting RP1, anterior branch of MA. MA deeply dichotomously forked twice. Remarks. The preserved hind wing venation of SRUI-99-71-63 is almost identical to that of the hind wing of the holotype. It is not determinable if specimen SR 16-004-001.01, the distal part of a wing, is a forewing or hind wing. Its venation differs from that of the holotype by its slightly more distal position of crossvein 3ra-rp, more distal forking of RP1, the anterior branch of RP1 being simple, and as a branch of RA within the pterostigma is visible, although indistinct (Fig. 10F). We preliminary consider these differences as intraspecific variability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFossil Insects in AmberFrench-language works237,207