Falcaustra catesbeianae Walton 1929
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Falcaustra catesbeianae Walton, 1929 Site of infection: intestine. Recruitment: ingestion. Distribution: Canada: Ontario (Baker 1986a; CMNPA). Japan: Hasama Oita (Hasegawa 2006). USA: Arkansas (McAllister et al. 2008; USNPC); California (Goldberg & Bursey 2002a); Georgia (Reiber et al. 1940); Illinois (Walton 1929; Walton 1933; USNPC); Louisiana (Walton 1929; USNPC); Maryland (USNPC); Michigan (Muzzall 1991); Nevada (Babero & Golling 1974); North Carolina (Brandt 1936); Ohio (Ashton & Rabalais 1978); Oklahoma (Walton 1929; Trowbridge & Hefley 1933; Kuntz & Self 1944; USNPC); South Carolina (USNPC); Tennessee (Reiber 1941); Texas (Harwood 1932; Slagle 1966; USNPC). Specimens in collections: CMNPA: 1985-0161. NSMT-As: 3031. USNPC: 33061, 44272, 44299, 50683, 50685, 50808, 50809, 52137, 91246, 52131, 66528, 84247, 84248, 84796, 84810, 91246. Remarks: Specimens from USNPC 44299, 50808, 50809, 52131, 66528 were recorded as Spironoura catesbianae. Record from Japan is considered an introduction by American bullfrogs imported from North America (Hasegawa 2006).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".