MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949813092 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5317190

Triarthron lecontei , Horn 1868

2009· article· en· W6949813092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeFrench hornParatypeMandible (arthropod mouthpart)White (mutation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Triarthron lecontei, Horn, 1868 (Figs. 1, 8–13, 14) Triarthron lecontei Horn, 1868: 131, 1880: 279; Hatch 1957: 26. Triarthron cedonulli Schaufuss, 1882: 43. Synonymized by Horn 1883: 284. Triarthron pennsylvanicum Horn, 1883: 284, new synonymy. Type material. Holotype of T. lecontei: ♂, bearing white label "Cal", red label " HoloTYPE / 3007", red label "M.C.Z. / Holotype 33555", white handwritten label " Triarthron / lecontei Horn ", and our red holotype label; seen and dissected (in Horn collection, MCZC). Type locality: "high Sierras east of Visalia, California ". Type of T. cedonulli originally in “Museum Ludwig Salvator, Dresden”; possibly now in Berlin or Hamburg. Not seen. Type locality: Cisco and Sacramento, California. Holotype of T. pennsylvanicum: female, bearing white label "Pen", red label " HoloTYPE / 3008"; red label "M.C.Z. / Holotype 33556"; white handwritten label " Triarthron / pennsylvanicum Horn "; and our red holotype label; seen and dissected (in Horn collection, MCZC). Type locality: Hazleton, Pennsylvania. Additional material examined. We examined 211 specimens (See Appendix). Diagnosis. Body elongate-oval, yellowish to reddish brown, shining. Length of pronotum + elytra = 2.4–3.6 mm (males), 2.3–3.7 mm (females); pronotum broad, ratio length:width = 1:1.6; elytra of medium proportions, ratio length:width = 1:0.7. Antennal club (Fig. 8) moderately broad, ratio club width:length = 1:2.8; antennomeres 6 and 7 equal in width, width ratio of antennomeres 6:7:8:9 = 1:1:1.2:2.0. Mandibles (Fig. 9) moderately elongate; right mandible with an elongate sub-apical tooth and an additional poorly defined tooth on apical one-half of inner margin; inner margin of left mandible with a thin, narrow plate on apical one-half and a tooth on basal one-half. Profemur and mesofemur of both sexes serrulate on posterior margins; female metafemur serrulate on posterior margin; male metafemur (Fig.10) with ventral region of posterior margin serrulate, dorsal margin with 3–6 small teeth, broad tooth-like lamina dorsally and ventrally at apex of posterior margin. All tibiae of male and female slender, of uniform diameter in apical three-fourths, not widened at apex, lacking distinct tarsal groove, outer margins spinose. Male. Aedeagus (Fig. 11) with median lobe broad at base, evenly tapering to narrowly rounded apex. Parameres not reaching apex of median lobe, slender, with 3–4 apical setae. Female. Coxites (Fig.13) moderately elongate, cylindrical, with subapical setae; styli elongate, inserted at apices of coxites, with elongate apical setae. Sternite 8 (Fig. 12) rounded apically; anterior apophysis broadly triangular. Taxonomic notes. Triarthron lecontei is highly variable, both within and between populations, in the following characters: strigulate microsculpture of head and pronotum (dense to absent); punctation of head and pronotum; elytra (glabrous to densely setose); lateral pronotal margins (rounded to angulate); outer margin of male metatibia (angulate or not); dentition of dorsal lamina of posterior margin of male metafemur (3–6 teeth); and shape of large tooth-like lamina at apex of male metafemur. These non-genital characters do not consistently vary in concert with one another. However, the characters of the aedeagus are consistent throughout the species range. We have not found characters to separate this species from Palearctic T. maerkelii Märkel with the description and figures presented in Daffner (1983) but have not seen enough specimens to be confident that T. lecontei is a junior synonym. Distribution. The species occurs in the north-central parts of western and eastern North America, and seems to be absent from the forested center of the northern part of the continent (Fig. 14). We have seen specimens from Canada: the provinces of British Columbia and Ontario; USA: the states of California, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington, and West Virginia. Field notes and habitats. Adults have been collected in mixed and coniferous forests and collected most frequently by flight intercept traps or evening car netting, with a few at ultraviolet lights and in pitfall or Lindgren funnel traps. Seasonality. Adults have been collected from March to August with most specimens in July.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207