Alamprops serratus Gerken 2018, n. comb.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alamprops serratus (Hart, 1930) n. comb. Lamprops serratus Hart, 1930: 36, fig. 4. Lamprops serrata.— Lomakina, 1958a: 93–94, fig. 40. Type material. Holotype: BCPM 978. Not seen Diagnosis. Carapace without lateral ridges; eyelobe with lenses, not extending to anterior border of pseudorostrum. Telson with 3 pairs of lateral setae, 5 terminal setae, outermost pair longest, inner pair and central seta equal. Uropod peduncle with 4 medial setae; uropod exopod article 1 0.9 length of article 2. Male unknown. Depth. 20–95 m. Distribution. Departure Bay, Vancouver Island, Canada, 49°12.6’N, 123°57.6’E (estimated from Google Earth); Kamschatka Peninsula. Remarks. Alamprops serratus is unique in Alamprops and Lamprops in having the anterolateral corner of the carapace strongly serrate rather than entire. Alamprops serratus is most similar to A. affinis, but in A. affinis the telson terminal setae are equal in length, while in A. serratus the outermost pair are longer than the medial three setae.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".